The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material
Abstract
The present study evaluates a class of models of human information processing made popular by Broadbent. A brief tachistoscopic display of one or two single letters, four-letter common words, or four-letter nonwords was immediately followed by a masking field along with two single-letter response alternatives chosen so as to minimize informational differences among the tasks. Giving 5s response alternatives before the stimulus display as well as after it caused an impairment of performance. Performance on single words was clearly better than performance on single letters. The data suggest that the first stages of information processing are done in parallel, but scanning of the resultant highly processed information is done serially.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thus, letters are also perceived more accurately when presented as part of a word than when presented in isolation, i.e. the Word superiority effect, (e.g. Reicher, 1969; Wheeler, 1970).”
From Human- versus Artificial Intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as Reicher, 1969
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, the 'word superiority effect' demonstrates that a single target letter is identified more efficiently in the context of a well-structured word than within a randomly structured letter string or a letter in isolation [3].”
From The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus (2003) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“Several lines of cognitive evidence indicate that the perceptual mechanisms that support word recognition rest on a critical process that groups the letters of a word together into an integrated perceptual unit (i.e. a 'visual word form').”
From The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus (2003) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“The word superiority effect is the fact that when asked to detect the presence of a letter, subjects typically show superior performance when the letter is embedded in a visual string that respects the structure of the learned language than when it is embedded in a random string.”
From Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area (2004) · cites this paper as Reicher, 1969
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.343 · Cited by 17,559
Lane, S. D. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315506173-8 · Cited by 4,707
The information available in brief visual presentations
Sperling, G. (1960) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0093759 · Cited by 4,042
Averbach, E., & Coriell, A. S. (1961) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1961.tb03987.x · Cited by 873
Successive approximations to a model for short term memory
Sperling, G. (1967) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(67)90070-4 · Cited by 591
THE TIME TAKEN UP BY CEREBRAL OPERATIONS
CATTELL, J. M. (1886) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/os-xi.42.220 · Cited by 264
Visual detection in relation to display size and redundancy of critical elements I
Estes, W. K., & Taylor, H. A. (1966) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03207814 · Cited by 136
Internal perceptual system noise and redundancy in simultaneous inputs in form identification
Eriksen, C. W., & Lappin, J. S. (1965) · Psychonomic Science · doi:10.3758/bf03343493 · Cited by 50
Perceptual selectivity in a visual recognition task.
Egeth, H. E., & Smith, E. E. (1967) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0024774 · Cited by 42
Independence in the perception of simultaneously presented forms at brief durations.
Eriksen, C. W., & Lappin, J. S. (1967) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0024254 · Cited by 40
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,001
Grainger, J., Bouttevin, S., Truc, C., Bastien‐Toniazzo, M., & Ziegler, J. C. (2003) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00145-7 · Cited by 91
Grouping and emergent features in vision: Toward a theory of basic Gestalts.
Pomerantz, J. R., & Portillo, M. C. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0024330 · Cited by 90
Frequent false hearing by older adults: The role of age differences in metacognition.
Rogers, C. S., Jacoby, L. L., & Sommers, M. S. (2011) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0026231 · Cited by 90
The language machine: Psycholinguistics in review
Altmann, G. T. M. (2001) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712601162130 · Cited by 91
Rossion, B., & Lochy, A. (2021) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-021-02370-0 · Cited by 99
The time course of reading processes in children with and without dyslexia: an ERP study
Hasko, S., Groth, K., Bruder, J., Bartling, J., & Schulte‐Körne, G. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00570 · Cited by 101
S-Oh-R: Oh Stages! Oh Resources!
Gopher, D., & Sanders, A. F. (1984) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69382-3_16 · Cited by 89
On the Difficulty of Noticing Obvious Features in Patient Appearance
Brooks, L. R., LeBlanc, V. R., & Norman, G. R. (2000) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00225 · Cited by 88
Contextual facilitation in a letter search task depends on how the prime is processed.
Smith, M. C. (1979) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.5.2.239 · Cited by 88
Automatic processes in word perception: An analysis from illusory conjunctions.
Prinzmetal, W., Hoffman, H. G., & Vest, K. (1991) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.17.4.902 · Cited by 87
Mano, Q. R., Humphries, C., Desai, R. H., Seidenberg, M. S., Osmon, D. C., Stengel, B. C., & Binder, J. R. (2012) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs093 · Cited by 87
Detecting letters in continuous text: Effects of display size.
Healy, A. F., Oliver, W. L., & McNamara, T. P. (1987) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.13.2.279 · Cited by 87
Jordan, T. R., Patching, G. R., & Thomas, S. M. (2003) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643290244000185 · Cited by 86
The bare bones of object recognition: implications from a case of object recognition impairment
Davidoff, J. B., & Warrington, E. K. (1999) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00076-1 · Cited by 86
Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (1999) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/s0001-6918(98)00053-5 · Cited by 84
Is Perception a Two-Way Street? The Case of Feedback Consistency in Visual Word Recognition
Peereman, R., Content, A., & Bonin, P. (1998) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2573 · Cited by 84
Do noise masks terminate target processing?
Schultz, D. W., & Eriksen, C. W. (1977) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03209198 · Cited by 84
Qiao, E., Vinckier, F., Szwed, M., Naccache, L., Valabrègue, R., Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.034 · Cited by 83
Acuity, crowding, reading and fixation stability
Falkenberg, H. K., Rubin, G. S., & Bex, P. J. (2006) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.09.014 · Cited by 83
Crump, M. J. C., & Logan, G. D. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0020696 · Cited by 90
The case of the vanishing frequency effect: A retest of the verification model.
Paap, K. R., & Johansen, L. S. (1994) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.20.6.1129 · Cited by 83
Representation and perception of scenic layout
Sanocki, T. (2003) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0010-0285(03)00002-1 · Cited by 84
Williams, A., & Weisstein, N. (1978) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197432 · Cited by 82
Huntsinger, J. R. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0027709 · Cited by 82
Word recognition inside out and outside in.
McCusker, L. X., Gough, P. B., & Bias, R. G. (1981) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.7.3.538 · Cited by 82
Expectancy as a determinant of functional units in perceptual recognition
Aderman, D., & Smith, E. E. (1971) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(71)90005-3 · Cited by 82
In search of the perfect orthography
Venezky, R. L. (2005) · Written Language & Literacy · doi:10.1075/wll.7.2.02ven · Cited by 81
Shorter identifier names take longer to comprehend
Hofmeister, J. C., Siegmund, J., & Holt, D. V. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER) · doi:10.1109/saner.2017.7884623 · Cited by 81
Letter information and orthographic context in word perception.
Massaro, D. W. (1979) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.5.4.595 · Cited by 81
Perception of letters, words, and nonwords.
Massaro, D. W. (1973) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0035681 · Cited by 81
Chapter 1 Linguistic Awareness and Orthographic Form
Mattingly, I. G. (1992) · Advances in psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62786-7 · Cited by 80
Visual, orthographic, phonological, and lexical influences in reading.
Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1994) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.20.6.1107 · Cited by 84
Case alternation impairs word identification
Coltheart, M., & Freeman, R. (1974) · Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society · doi:10.3758/bf03333407 · Cited by 80
Chetail, F. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.015 · Cited by 79
Reading: The Confluence of Vision and Language
Yeatman, J. D., & White, A. L. (2021) · Annual Review of Vision Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-093019-113509 · Cited by 89
Predictive processing of scenes and objects
Peelen, M. V., Berlot, E., & de Lange, F. P. (2023) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-023-00254-0 · Cited by 89
Assessing the importance of letter pairs in initial, exterior, and interior positions in reading.
Jordan, T. R., Thomas, S. M., Patching, G. R., & Scott-Brown, K. C. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.883 · Cited by 79
Prinzmetal, W., Henderson, D. J., & Ivry, R. B. (1995) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.21.6.1362 · Cited by 79
Perceptual interactions in two-word displays: Familiarity and similarity effects.
McClelland, J. L., & Mozer, M. C. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.12.1.18 · Cited by 80
Evidence for lexical access in a simultaneous matching task
Chambers, S. M., & Forster, K. I. (1975) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197530 · Cited by 78
Jordan, T. R., Patching, G. R., & Milner, A. D. (1998) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/713755764 · Cited by 78
Modes of Lexical Access in the Callosotomized Brain
Reuter‐Lorenz, P. A., & Baynes, K. (1992) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1992.4.2.155 · Cited by 78
Wong, A. C. ‐., Bukach, C. M., Hsiao, J. H., Greenspon, E. B., Ahern, E., Duan, Y., & Lui, K. F. H. (2012) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/12.13.7 · Cited by 77
Object identification in context: The visual processing of natural scenes.
Henderson, J. M. (1992) · Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie · doi:10.1037/h0084325 · Cited by 77
Jordan, T. R. (1990) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.16.4.893 · Cited by 77
Word recognition and orthographic context effects in a letter-by-letter reader*1
Bub, D. N. (1989) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/0093-934x(89)90073-4 · Cited by 76
(2013) · Natural language processing · doi:10.1075/nlp · Cited by 76
Martin, C. D., Nazir, T. A., Thierry, G., Paulignan, Y., & Démonet, J. (2006) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.097 · Cited by 76
Metacontrast Masking and Attention
Shelley-Tremblay, J. F., & Mack, A. (1999) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00197 · Cited by 75
Lateralization in the visual perception of Chinese characters and words
CHENG, C. (1989) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/0093-934x(89)90093-x · Cited by 74
Sensory and cognitive determinants of reading speed
Jackson, M. D., & McClelland, J. L. (1975) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(75)80044-2 · Cited by 74
The development of visual information processing skills related to reading
Juola, J. F., Schadler, M., Chabot, R. J., & McCaughey, M. W. (1978) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-0965(78)90069-3 · Cited by 74
The Epistemology of Clinical Reasoning
Norman, G. R. (2000) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200010001-00041 · Cited by 79
Word perception and misperception in context.
Potter, M. C., Moryadas, A., Abrams, I., & Noel, A. (1993) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.1.3 · Cited by 73
Prosopagnosia and visual object agnosia: A behavioral study
Levine, D. N. (1978) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/0093-934x(78)90031-7 · Cited by 73
Parallel, cascaded, interactive processing of words during sentence reading
Wen, Y., Snell, J., & Grainger, J. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.013 · Cited by 72
Adult age differences in letter-level and word-level processing.
Allen, P. A., Madden, D. J., & Crozier, L. C. (1991) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037//0882-7974.6.2.261 · Cited by 72
Word and pseudoword superiority effects reflected in the ERP waveform
Coch, D., & Mitra, P. (2010) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.02.084 · Cited by 72
Jordan, T. R., Patching, G. R., & Milner, A. D. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.26.3.1192 · Cited by 72
Reading of letters and words in a patient with Balint's syndrome
Baylis, G. C., Driver, J., Baylis, L. L., & Rafal, R. D. (1994) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(94)90109-0 · Cited by 72
A Bayesian model for implicit effects in perceptual identification.
Schooler, L. J., Shiffrin, R. M., & Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.257 · Cited by 77
Spatially Determined Deficits in Letter and Word Processing
Rapp, B. C., & Caramazza, A. (1991) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643299108253375 · Cited by 71
Cueing spatial attention during processing of words and letter strings in normals
Siéroff, É., & Posner, M. I. (1988) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643298808253269 · Cited by 70
Role of High-Level Knowledge in Memory for Chess Positions
Cooke, N. J., Atlas, R. S., Lane, D. M., & Berger, R. C. (1993) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1423181 · Cited by 70
Salience of the word as a unit in the perception of language
Osgood, C. E., & Hoosain, R. (1974) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03205845 · Cited by 69
Oscillatory neuromagnetic activity induced by language and non-language stimuli
Eulitz, C., Maeß, B., Pantev, C., Friederici, A. D., Feige, B., & Elbert, T. R. (1996) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0926-6410(96)00026-2 · Cited by 70
Connectionist Approaches to Reading
Plaut, D. C. (2008) · Blackwell Publishing Ltd eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470757642.ch2 · Cited by 70
Split fovea theory and the role of the two cerebral hemispheres in reading: A review of the evidence
Ellis, A. W., & Brysbaert, M. (2009) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.021 · Cited by 67
Optimizing the reading of electronic text using rapid serial visual presentation
Castelhano, M. S., & Muter, P. (2001) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449290110069400 · Cited by 67
Homophone interference effects in visual word recognition
Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/02724980244000422 · Cited by 67
Context effects in letter perception: Comparison of two theories.
Richman, H., & Simon, H. A. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.3.417 · Cited by 67
Bijeljac-Babic, R., Millogo, V., Farioli, F., & Grainger, J. (2004) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1023/b:read.0000032664.20755.af · Cited by 62
Automatic letter priming in an alphabetic decision task
Jacobs, A. M., & Grainger, J. (1991) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03211615 · Cited by 66
Emotional influences on word recognition
Gerrig, R. J., & Bower, G. H. (1982) · Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society · doi:10.3758/bf03330231 · Cited by 66
Cross-modal illusory conjunctions between vision and touch.
Cinel, C., Humphreys, G. W., & Poli, R. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.28.5.1243 · Cited by 66
Rastle, K. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568971.013.0005 · Cited by 64
Schweigert, W. A., & Moates, D. R. (1988) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/bf01067198 · Cited by 64
Unconsciously controlled processing: the stroop effect reconsidered
Besner, D., & Stolz, J. A. (1999) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03210834 · Cited by 64
RetractedThe role of bigram frequency in the perception of words and nonwords
Rice, G. A., & Robinson, D. O. (1975) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197523 · Cited by 64
Different perceptual codes support priming for words and pseudowords: Was Morton right all along?
Bowers, J. S. (1996) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.22.6.1336 · Cited by 65
Wood, B. P. (1999) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.211.1.r99ap431 · Cited by 64
Length effects in word perception: We is better than I but worse than you or them.
Samuel, A. G., van Santen, J. P. H., & Johnston, J. C. (1982) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.8.1.91 · Cited by 64
Critical influence of particular experiences in the perception of letters, words, and phrases
Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Brooks, L. R. (1988) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03214219 · Cited by 64
Three interrelated problems in reading: A review
Bradshaw, J. L. (1975) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03212888 · Cited by 64
ERP differences of pre-lexical processing between dyslexic and non-dyslexic children
Kast, M., Elmer, S., Jäncke, L., & Meyer, M. E. (2010) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.04.003 · Cited by 63
Errors in proofreading: Evidence for the use of word shape in word recognition
Monk, A. F., & Hulme, C. (1983) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197657 · Cited by 63
Effects of stimulus familiarity upon judged visual duration
Avant, L. L., Lyman, P. J., & Antes, J. R. (1975) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03203208 · Cited by 65
Integrating information across eye fixations in reading: The role of letter and word units
Inhoff, A. W. (1990) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(90)90027-d · Cited by 62
Scaltritti, M., & Balota, D. A. (2013) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.018 · Cited by 61
Purcell, D. G., & Stewart, A. L. (1986) · Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society · doi:10.3758/bf03330521 · Cited by 61
Proofreading familiar text: Constraints on visual processing
Levy, B. A. (1983) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197655 · Cited by 61
Why words are perceived more accurately than nonwords: Inference versus unitization.
Smith, E. E., & Haviland, S. E. (1972) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0032146 · Cited by 61
Pushing typists back on the learning curve: Revealing chunking in skilled typewriting.
Yamaguchi, M., & Logan, G. D. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0033809 · Cited by 64
The Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics
Li, P. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511596865 · Cited by 59
Letter and configuration information in word identification
McClelland, J. L. (1977) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(77)80015-7 · Cited by 59
The advantage of word-based processing in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements.
Li, X., Gu, J., Liu, P., & Rayner, K. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0030337 · Cited by 58
The evolution of pure alexia: A longitudinal study of recovery*1
Behrmann, M. (1990) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/0093-934x(90)90148-a · Cited by 58
Sanocki, T., & Dyson, M. C. (2011) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0220-9 · Cited by 58
Chapter 7 Orthographic Neighborhoods and Visual Word Recognition
Grainger, J. (1992) · Advances in psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62792-2 · Cited by 58
Reading ability and the encoding of item and location information.
Mason, M. (1980) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.6.1.89 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Reicher, G. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Oregon (US)
- Corresponding author
- Reicher, Gerald M.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Published
- 1969
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 275-280
- ISSN
- 0022-1015 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2147637089
- Cited by
- 1,252
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 43
- FWCI
- 13.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- perceptual identification, stimulus meaningfulness, parallel computing, serial scanning, word recognition, letter recognition, nonword recognition, masking, information processing stages
- MeSH terms
- Form Perception, Humans, Information Theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
