Cited by 222Personality Traits and PsychologySocial and Intergroup PsychologyPsychological Testing and Assessment

Sex differences in ego functioning: Exploratory studies of agency and communion.

Carlson, Rae·1971·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0031947

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carlson, R.
Affiliations
National Institute of Mental Health (US)
Corresponding author
Carlson, Rae
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1971
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
267-277
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2041440728
Cited by
222
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
10.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
sex differences, ego functions, agency, communion, ego states, gender differences in personality
MeSH terms
Attitude, Ego, Emotions, Female, Group Processes, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Libido, Male, Personality, Psychosexual Development, Self Concept, Sex, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review