Cited by 33Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

The effect of recall upon recognition.

Hanawalt, Nelson G., Tarr, Arlene G.·1961·Journal of Experimental Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0041917

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When the final test is recall, the testing effect is robust; when the final test is recognition, sometimes there are benefits of initial recall but sometimes not.

    “When the final test is recall, the testing effect is robust; however, when the final test is recognition, sometimes there are benefits of initial recall (Hanawalt & Tarr 1961, Roediger & McDermott 1995) but sometimes not (Darley & Murdock 1971, Lockhart 1975).”

    From Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning (2021) · cites this paper as Hanawalt & Tarr 1961

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanawalt, N. G., & Tarr, A. G.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
1961-10
Volume
62
Issue
4
Pages
361-367
ISSN
0022-1015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988654930
Cited by
33
References
6
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
memory retrieval, recognition memory
MeSH terms
Humans, Memory, Mental Recall

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review