The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Delay of reinforcement: A historical review.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior
Easterbrook, J. A. (1959) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0047707 · Cited by 3,090
The goal-gradient hypothesis and maze learning.
Hull, C. L. (1932) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0072640 · Cited by 593
Preference for delayed reward as a function of age, intelligence, and length of delay interval.
Mischel, W., & Metzner, R. (1962) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0045046 · Cited by 341
Cited by
Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.
Ainslie, G. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0076860 · Cited by 2,708
Ainslie, G. W. (1974) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1974.21-485 · Cited by 759
Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcement
Garcia, J., Ervin, F. R., & Koelling, R. A. (1966) · Psychonomic Science · doi:10.3758/bf03328311 · Cited by 748
Timing of feedback and verbal learning.
Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1988) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543058001079 · Cited by 703
Feedback in Written Instruction
Kulhavy, R. W. (1977) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543047002211 · Cited by 571
Metadata
- Authors
- Renner, K. E.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1964
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 341-361
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043476737
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Delay of reinforcement: A historical review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0048335
- The paper
- Renner, K. E. (1964). Delay of reinforcement: A historical review. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048335
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
