Cited by 75Health Policy Implementation ScienceOrganizational Change and LeadershipInnovations in Medical Education

iLead—a transformational leadership intervention to train healthcare managers’ implementation leadership

Open access
Richter, Anne, von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica, Lornudd, Caroline, Lundmark, Robert, Mosson, Rebecca, Hasson, Henna·2015·Implementation Science

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Leadership is a key feature in implementation efforts, which is highlighted in most implementation frameworks. However, in studying leadership and implementation, only few studies rely on established leadership theory, which makes it difficult to draw conclusions regarding what kinds of leadership managers should perform and under what circumstances. In industrial and organizational psychology, transformational leadership and contingent reward have been identified as effective leadership styles for facilitating change processes, and these styles map well onto the behaviors identified in implementation research. However, it has been questioned whether these general leadership styles are sufficient to foster specific results; it has therefore been suggested that the leadership should be specific to the domain of interest, e.g., implementation. To this end, an intervention specifically involving leadership, which we call implementation leadership, is developed and tested in this project. The aim of the intervention is to increase healthcare managers' generic implementation leadership skills, which they can use for any implementation efforts in the future. METHODS/DESIGN: The intervention is conducted in healthcare in Stockholm County, Sweden, where first- and second-line managers were invited to participate. Two intervention groups are included, including 52 managers. Intervention group 1 consists of individual managers, and group 2 of managers from one division. A control group of 39 managers is additionally included. The intervention consists of five half-day workshops aiming at increasing the managers' implementation leadership, which is the primary outcome of this intervention. The intervention will be evaluated through a mixed-methods approach. A pre- and post-design applying questionnaires at three time points (pre-, directly after the intervention, and 6 months post-intervention) will be used, in addition to process evaluation questionnaires related to each workshop. In addition, interviews will be conducted over time to evaluate the intervention. DISCUSSION: The proposed intervention represents a novel contribution to the implementation literature, being the first to focus on strengthening healthcare managers' generic skills in implementation leadership.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13012-016-0475-6

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing leadership-focused implementation strategies, such as LOCI or iLead, likely have utility for promoting implementation leadership behaviors among principals and other school building-level leaders.

    “Existing leadership-focused implementation strategies, such as Leadership and Organizational Change for Implementation (LOCI) [28] or iLead [93] also likely have utility for promoting implementation leadership behaviors among principals and other school building-level leaders.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 89 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]Bass BM Leadership and performance beyond expectations 1985 New York Free Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richter, A., von Thiele Schwarz, U., Lornudd, C., Lundmark, R., Mosson, R., & Hasson, H.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Region Stockholm (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Richter, Anne
Venue
Implementation Science
Published
2015-12
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
108-108
ISSN
1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2477683144
Cited by
75
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 3
FWCI
9.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
AFA Försäkring (140114)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
implementation leadership, transformational leadership, contingent reward, health managers, leadership interventions, implementation research, organizational change, workshop-based training, health management
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Health Personnel, Health Plan Implementation, Health Services Administration, Humans, Inservice Training, Leadership, Organizational Innovation, Sweden

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review