Cited by 88Misinformation and Its ImpactsParanormal Experiences and BeliefsSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Examining conspiracist beliefs about the disappearance of Amelia Earhart

Swami, Viren, Furnham, Adrian·2012·The Journal of General Psychology

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that conspiracist ideation forms part of a monological belief system in which one conspiracist idea acts as evidence for new conspiracist ideas. Here, we examined this possibility in relation to an event lacking reliable or conclusive evidence, namely the disappearance of Amelia Earhart and Fred Noonan. A total of 914 members of the British general public completed scales measuring their beliefs about the disappearance of Earhart and Noonan, belief in conspiracy theories, the Big Five personality factors, support for democratic principles, political cynicism, self-esteem, and self-assessed intelligence. Results showed that belief in conspiracy theories was associated with the endorsement of less plausible explanations for the disappearance of Earhart and Noonan. In addition, belief in less plausible explanations was also significantly associated with lower self-assessed intelligence, greater political cynicism, lower self-esteem, and higher Agreeableness scores. These results are discussed in relation to monological belief systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00221309.2012.697932

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swami, V., & Furnham, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Westminster (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Venue
The Journal of General Psychology
Published
2012-09-20
Volume
139
Issue
4
Pages
244-259
ISSN
  • 0022-1309 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-0888
OpenAlex
W2078271151
Cited by
88
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
17.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of General Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
conspiracist ideation, conspiracy theories, political cynicism, self-esteem, agreeableness, Big Five personality traits, democratic principles
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attitude, Culture, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Politics, Self Concept, History, 20th Century, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review