Cited by 28Behavioral and Psychological StudiesAttachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychology and Mental Health

Relational responding in parents

Open access
Murrell, Amy R., Wilson, Kelly G., LaBorde, Cicely T., Drake, Chad E., Rogers, Leslie J.·2008·The Behavior Analyst Today

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between parenting stress and relational conditioning.Fourteen students who were not mothers, 14 mothers who reported high parenting stress and 14 mothers with low parenting stress completed two matching-to-sample (MTS) computer tasks, each requiring formation of three 3-member classes.The first MTS task examined class acquisition, with neutral symbols and stimuli theorized to be emotionally relevant to parents (i.e., negative child behavior words) or not (i.e., fruit or medical words).The second task required participants to form classes that included symbols, negative child behaviors and positive parenting words.Statistical analyses were conducted on number of trials needed to meet criterion, percent correct in training and testing, and latency to respond.Overall, distressed mothers were slower to respond than other participants.However, in MTS 1, they responded more quickly and made fewer errors in response to stimuli in the child behavior class.Further, they obtained a higher percent correct for these items than the other participants.In the second MTS, distressed mothers required more trials to reach criterion and made more errors than the other participants.Findings indicate that emotionally relevant stimuli are easily related to other things.However, once formed, emotionally relevant classes are difficult to relate in new ways.The findings may have important clinical and treatment implications for parents, particularly if computer responding relates to "real-world" inflexible parenting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0100659

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most parent-focused interventions for childhood anxiety have assumed that parents have the psychological flexibility to make behavior changes.

    “Most parent-focused interventions for childhood anxiety have one notable limitation in that they have assumed that parents have the psychological flexibility to make behavior changes, such that they are able to engage in flexible patterns of behavior that support their learning more effective parenting strategies (13).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murrell, A. R., Wilson, K. G., LaBorde, C. T., Drake, C. E., & Rogers, L. J.
Affiliations
University of North Texas (US)
Venue
The Behavior Analyst Today
Published
2008
Volume
9
Issue
3-4
Pages
196-214
ISSN
1539-4352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042193732
Cited by
28
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
The Behavior Analyst Today (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
parental stress, relational responding, matching-to-sample, mothers, response latency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review