Cited by 68Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMental Health Treatment and Access

What might get in the way: Barriers to the use of apps for depression

Open access
Stiles-Shields, Colleen, Montague, Enid, Lattie, Emily G, Kwasny, Mary J, Mohr, David C·2017·DIGITAL HEALTH

Abstract

Objective: Smartphones are being used with increasing frequency to deliver behavioral interventions for depression via apps. However, barriers specific to using an app for depression are poorly defined. The purpose of the current study is to identify barriers to the use of a mobile app to deliver treatment for depression. Secondarily, design implications will be provided based upon identified barriers. Method: A card sorting task that ranked and grouped barriers to the use of apps for depression was completed. Participants first completed a card sorting task identifying barriers to face-to-face treatment, as a primer to identification of treatment barriers. The sample consisted of those above ( n = 9) and below ( n = 11) the threshold for a referral to psychotherapy, to capture anticipated barriers for likely end users. Cluster analyses were conducted to analyze the card sorting data. Multiple analyses were conducted to identify: 1) the most important barriers, and 2) how consistently barriers were ranked as important. Result: The card sorting task identified a number of primary barriers to the use of apps for depression treatment, including concerns over intervention efficacy, app functioning, privacy, cost, and lack of guidance and tailored feedback. The top face-to-face treatment barrier was cost, overlapping with mobile barriers. Conclusion: This study identified perceived barriers to the use of mobile treatment apps. Identification of barriers implicates design recommendations for apps for depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2055207617713827

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [31]Krebs P Duncan DT Health app use among US mobile phone owners: A national survey. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2015; 3: e401. PMC4704953 26537656

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stiles-Shields, C., Montague, E., Lattie, E. G., Kwasny, M. J., & Mohr, D. C.
Affiliations
  • Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
DIGITAL HEALTH
Published
2017-01
Volume
3
Pages
2055207617713827-2055207617713827
ISSN
2055-2076 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2623357307
Cited by
68
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
depression, mobile health apps, barriers to app use, mobile application design, privacy concerns, cost barriers, personalized feedback, card sorting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review