Cited by 29Memory Processes and InfluencesStatistics Education and MethodologiesVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

Implementing distributed practice in statistics courses: Benefits for retention and transfer.

Ebersbach, Mirjam, Barzagar Nazari, Katharina·2020·Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

Abstract

The present study investigated the effect of distributed versus crammed practice before a course deadline on the retention and transfer of knowledge, and whether learner characteristics moderate the effect.In Experiment 1, only 41% (N = 38) of the initially enrolled students worked the voluntary but recommended practice tasks.Moreover, markedly fewer students did so in the distributed condition (12%) than the crammed practice condition (29%).In Experiment 2, working the practice tasks was mandatory and more students completed them (N = 105, i.e., 81%).Students who distributed practice clearly outperformed students who crammed practice on tests of knowledge retention and transfer five weeks after the practice deadline.No moderating effects of learner characteristics emerged.The study shows that distributed practice following knowledge acquisition is a powerful learning tool for fostering long-term retention and transfer with adults in authentic educational contexts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0101860

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ebersbach, M., & Barzagar Nazari, K.
Venue
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Published
2020-12
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
532-541
ISSN
  • 2211-3681 (ISSN-L)
  • 2211-369X
OpenAlex
W4285579659
Cited by
11
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
Funders
State of Hesse
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistics Education and Methodologies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
distributed practice, cramming, statistics education, knowledge retention, knowledge transfer, learner characteristics, adult learning, long-term retention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review