Cited by 40Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Use of an online smoking cessation community promotes abstinence: results of propensity score weighting

Open access
Graham, Amanda L., Papandonatos, George D., Erar, Bahar, Stanton, Cassandra A.·2015·Health Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We estimated the causal effects of use of an online smoking cessation community on 30-day point prevalence abstinence at 3 months. METHODS: Participants (N = 492) were adult current smokers in the enhanced Internet arm of The iQUITT Study, a randomized trial of Internet and telephone treatment for smoking cessation. All participants accessed a Web-based smoking-cessation program that included a large, established online community. Automated tracking metrics of passive (e.g., reading forum posts, viewing member profiles) and active (e.g., writing forum posts, sending private messages) community use were extracted from the site at 3 months. Self-selected community use defines the groups of interest: "None," "Passive," and "Both" (passive + active). Inverse probability of treatment weighting corrected for baseline imbalances on demographic, smoking, psychosocial, and medical history variables. Propensity weights estimated via generalized boosted models were used to calculate Average Treatment Effects (ATE) and Average Treatment effects on the Treated (ATT). RESULTS: Patterns of community use were: None = 198 (40.2%), Passive = 110 (22.4%), and Both = 184 (37.4%). ATE-weighted abstinence rates were: None = 4.2% (95% CI = 1.5-6.9); Passive = 15.1% (95% CI = 8.4-21.9); Both = 20.4% (95% CI = 13.9-26.8). ATT-weighted abstinence rates indicated even greater benefits of community use. CONCLUSIONS: Community users were more likely to quit smoking at 3 months than nonusers. The estimated benefit from use of online community resources was even larger among subjects with high propensity to use them. No differences in abstinence emerged between passive and passive/active users. Results suggest that lurking in online communities confers specific abstinence benefits. Implications of these findings for online cessation communities are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/hea0000278

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DBCIs have the potential to generate datasets sufficiently large to reliably model and experimentally test mediation of outcomes by engagement with particular intervention components and to statistically control for confounding moderator effects such as baseline motivation levels.

    “DBCIs have the potential to generate datasets sufficiently large to be able to reliably model and experimentally test 34 mediation of outcomes by engagement with particular intervention components and to statistically control for confounding moderator effects such as baseline motivation levels.22,26,35,36”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. McCausland KL Curry LE Mushro A Carothers S Xiao H Vallone DM 2011 Promoting a Web-Based Smoking Cessation Intervention: Implications for Practice Cases in Public Health Communication & Marketing, 5 Proc 3 26 10.2196/jmir.2277 · DOI
  2. Rosenbaum PR 2002 Observational studies New York, NY Springer

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graham, A. L., Papandonatos, G. D., Erar, B., & Stanton, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Truth Initiative (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Westat (United States) (US)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2015-12
Volume
34
Issue
Suppl
Pages
1286-1295
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2409227394
Cited by
40
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA104836)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
smoking cessation, abstinence, causal effect estimation, propensity score weighting, generalized boosted models
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Residence Characteristics, Smoking, Telephone, Smoking Cessation, Internet, Propensity Score

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review