Cited by 58Smoking Behavior and CessationSocial Media in Health EducationHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Superusers in social networks for smoking cessation: Analysis of demographic characteristics and posting behavior from the canadian cancer society’s smokers’ helpline online and stopsmokingcenter.net

Open access
van Mierlo, Trevor, Voci, Sabrina, Lee, Sharon, Fournier, Rachel, Selby, Peter·2012·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Online social networks are popular components of behavior-change websites. Research has identified the participation of certain network members who assume leadership roles by providing support, advice, and direction to other members. In the literature, these individuals have been variously defined as key players, posters, active users, or caretakers. Despite their identification, very little research has been conducted on the contributions or demographic characteristics of this population. For this study, we collectively categorized key players, posters, active users, and caretakers as superusers. OBJECTIVES: To analyze data from two large but distinct Web-assisted tobacco interventions (WATI) to help gain insight into superuser demographic characteristics and how they use social networks. METHODS: We extracted cross-sectional data sets containing posting behaviors and demographic characteristics from a free, publicly funded program (the Canadian Cancer Society's Smokers' Helpline Online: SHO), and a free, privately run program (StopSmokingCenter.net: SSC). RESULTS: Within the reporting period (SHO: June 26, 2008 to October 12, 2010; SSC: May 17, 2007 to October 12, 2010), 21,128 individuals registered for the SHO and 11,418 registered for the SSC. Within the same period, 1670 (7.90%) registrants made at least one post in the SHO social network, and 1627 (14.25%) registrants made at least one post in the SSC social network. SHO and SSC superusers accounted for 0.4% (n = 95) and 1.1% (n = 124) of all registrants, and 5.7% (95/1670) and 7.62% (124/1627) of all social network participants, and contributed to 34.78% (29,422/84,599) and 46.22% (61,820/133,753) of social network content, respectively. Despite vast differences in promotion and group management rules, and contrary to the beliefs of group moderators, there were no statistically significant differences in demographic characteristics between the two superuser groups. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study that compared demographic characteristics and posting behavior from two separate eHealth social networks. Despite vast differences in promotional efforts and management styles, both WATI attracted superusers with similar characteristics. As superusers drive network traffic, organizations promoting or supporting WATI should dedicate resources to encourage superuser participation. Further research regarding member dynamics and optimization of social networks for health care purposes is required.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.1854

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 90-9-1 rule classifies user participation into three categories: Lurkers, Contributors, and Superusers, where 90% of actors do not participate, 9% seldom contribute, and 1% contribute significantly to the content.

    “The 90–9–1 rule classifies user participation into three categories; specifically, Lurkers, Contributors, and Superusers, where 90% of actors do not participate, 9% seldom contribute, and 1% contribute significantly to the content (15, 17, 18, 22, 23).”

    From Trouble with the curve: the 90-9-1 rule to measure volitional participation inequalities among Royal Canadian Mounted Police cadets during training (2024) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Discussion (Strengths and Limitations; page unavailable) distinguishes lurkers, members who create limited posts, and superusers. The Results (General Posting Behavior and Demographic Characteristics; page unavailable) show that a small group of superusers contributed substantial content. The paper does not state the 90–9–1 rule or its 90%, 9%, and 1% breakdown; its measured percentages differ. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • RCMP Cadet participation in daily surveys does not differ from the general population.

    “RCMP Cadet participation does not differ from the general population”

    From Trouble with the curve: the 90-9-1 rule to measure volitional participation inequalities among Royal Canadian Mounted Police cadets during training (2024) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Methods (Data Collection) describe a registration questionnaire for users of two smoking-cessation websites, and the Results (Comparison of SHO and SSC Superusers) compare those sites’ superusers. Searches for RCMP cadets and daily survey participation found no passage addressing whether cadet participation differs from that of the general population. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Mierlo, T., Voci, S., Lee, S., Fournier, R., & Selby, P.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • Canadian Cancer Society (CA)
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2012-06-26
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
e66
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2168211098
Cited by
58
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
  • University of Toronto
  • Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
superusers, social networking sites, smoking cessation, posting behavior, demographic factors, online support groups, user engagement, Canada
MeSH terms
Canada, Cross-Sectional Studies, Demography, Health Promotion, Humans, Neoplasms, Online Systems, Patient Compliance, Smoking, Social Support, Smoking Cessation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review