Cited by 11Cardiac Health and Mental HealthDigital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Metacognitive therapy self-help for anxiety-depression: single-blind randomized feasibility trial in cardiovascular disease

Open access
Wells, Adrian, Reeves, David, Heal, Calvin, Fisher, Peter, Doherty, Patrick, Davies, Linda, Heagerty, Anthony, Capobianco, Lora·2022·Health Psychology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One in three cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients experience significant anxiety and depression. Current psychological interventions have limited efficacy in reducing such symptoms and are offered as a face-to-face intervention that may be a barrier to accessing treatment. We evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of delivering assisted home-based self-help metacognitive therapy (home-MCT) to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) patients experiencing anxiety and depression. METHOD: One hundred eight CR patients with elevated anxiety and/or depression were recruited to a single-blind randomized feasibility trial across two United Kingdom National Health Service Trusts and were randomized to usual CR or usual CR plus home-MCT. The feasibility and acceptability of adding home-MCT to CR was based on credibility or expectancy ratings, recruitment rate, drop-outs, number of CR and home-MCT modules completed, and ability of outcome measures to discriminate between patients. The study was used to refine the sample size estimate for a full-scale trial. The quality of telephone support calls delivered by CR staff trained in MCT was assessed. RESULTS: Home-MCT was found to be feasible and acceptable for the current CR patients with anxiety and depression. Recruitment and retention of participants was high, and attendance at CR was similar for both groups. Completion of home-MCT was high, but the quality of telephone support calls delivered was lower than expected. CONCLUSIONS: Home-MCT was acceptable and feasible to deliver to CR patients experiencing anxiety and depression, and the feasibility of conducting a full-scale trial of the intervention was established. Home-MCT may provide additional treatment options for cardiac patients experiencing psychological distress. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/hea0001168

Cites

52 of 53 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. British Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. (2017). The BACPR standards and core components for cardiovascular disease prevention and rehabilitation (3rd ed.). http://www.bacpr.com/resources/BACPR_Standards_and_Core_Components_2017.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wells, A., Reeves, D., Heal, C., Fisher, P., Doherty, P., Davies, L., Heagerty, A., & Capobianco, L.
Affiliations
  • Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • University of York (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Manchester Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2022-05
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
366-377
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W4224942355
Cited by
11
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health Research (RP-PG-1211-20011)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
metacognitive therapy, anxiety, depression, cardiovascular disease, cardiac rehabilitation, telephone-delivered intervention, feasibility, acceptability, psychological distress, psychological intervention
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Cardiovascular Diseases, Depression, Feasibility Studies, Humans, State Medicine, Single-Blind Method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review