Metacognitive therapy self-help for anxiety-depression: single-blind randomized feasibility trial in cardiovascular disease
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: One in three cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients experience significant anxiety and depression. Current psychological interventions have limited efficacy in reducing such symptoms and are offered as a face-to-face intervention that may be a barrier to accessing treatment. We evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of delivering assisted home-based self-help metacognitive therapy (home-MCT) to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) patients experiencing anxiety and depression. METHOD: One hundred eight CR patients with elevated anxiety and/or depression were recruited to a single-blind randomized feasibility trial across two United Kingdom National Health Service Trusts and were randomized to usual CR or usual CR plus home-MCT. The feasibility and acceptability of adding home-MCT to CR was based on credibility or expectancy ratings, recruitment rate, drop-outs, number of CR and home-MCT modules completed, and ability of outcome measures to discriminate between patients. The study was used to refine the sample size estimate for a full-scale trial. The quality of telephone support calls delivered by CR staff trained in MCT was assessed. RESULTS: Home-MCT was found to be feasible and acceptable for the current CR patients with anxiety and depression. Recruitment and retention of participants was high, and attendance at CR was similar for both groups. Completion of home-MCT was high, but the quality of telephone support calls delivered was lower than expected. CONCLUSIONS: Home-MCT was acceptable and feasible to deliver to CR patients experiencing anxiety and depression, and the feasibility of conducting a full-scale trial of the intervention was established. Home-MCT may provide additional treatment options for cardiac patients experiencing psychological distress. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the PATHWAY program, half of the patients indicated that they did not need the telephone calls and even rated them negatively.
“In evaluating the program, however, half of the patients indicated that they did not need the calls and even rated them negatively (26).”
From Improving mental well-being in psychocardiology—a feasibility trial for a non-blended web application as a brief metacognitive-based intervention in cardiovascular disease patients (2023) · cites this paper as [26]
The Results (Acceptability; page not provided) say 40% of respondents did not need the calls, while 40% said they did; the Discussion describes patients as evenly split. The claim that patients rated the calls negatively is not supported: the poor delivery-quality ratings in the Results (Home-MCT Telephone Support Calls Quality Ratings) came from independent raters, not patients. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMCT has been shown to be an encouraging approach for brief internet interventions.
“Recently, MCT has been also shown to be an encouraging approach for brief internet interventions (26, 27).”
From Improving mental well-being in psychocardiology—a feasibility trial for a non-blended web application as a brief metacognitive-based intervention in cardiovascular disease patients (2023) · cites this paper as [26]
The Discussion reports that home-based MCT appeared feasible and acceptable for cardiac rehabilitation patients, supporting the description of MCT as encouraging. But the Method > Treatment specifies a six-module paper manual with telephone support, not an internet intervention; the paper does not establish its promise for brief internet delivery. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredWells et al. showed a completion rate of 50-70% of at least four modules while being guided.
“Wells et al. (26) showed a completion rate of 50–70% of at least four modules while being guided.”
From Improving mental well-being in psychocardiology—a feasibility trial for a non-blended web application as a brief metacognitive-based intervention in cardiovascular disease patients (2023) · cites this paper as [26]
The Results (Home-MCT Adherence) report that 24 patients completed at least four modules: 45.3% of eligible Home-MCT patients, or 72.7% of those who returned the credibility questionnaire. The Discussion describes 50–70% as an assumed completion range, not a single observed rate. The Method (Statistical Analysis) confirms that patients received supportive telephone calls. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x · Cited by 47,139 · see citing works
Depression and quality of life in older persons: A review
Sivertsen, H., Bjørkløf, G. H., Engedal, K., Selbæk, G., & Helvik, A.-S. (2015) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders · doi:10.1159/000437299 · Cited by 14,152 · see citing works
Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
Herdman, M., Gudex, C., Lloyd, A., Janssen, M., Kind, P., Parkin, D., Bonsel, G., & Badia, X. (2011) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x · Cited by 9,795 · cited 6× · see citing works
“The EQ-5D-5L score can be calculated as a utility value.”
BackgroundInfluentialJacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.59.1.12 · Cited by 7,770 · see citing works
Kyu, H. H., Abate, D., Abate, K. H., Abay, S. M., Abbafati, C., Abbasi, N., Abbastabar, H., Abd-Allah, F., Abdela, J., Abdelalim, A., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32335-3 · Cited by 4,111 · see citing works
CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials.
Eldridge, S. M., Chan, C. L., Campbell, M. J., Bond, C. M., Hopewell, S., Thabane, L., & Lancaster, G. A. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i5239 · Cited by 3,404 · see citing works
CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials
on behalf of the PAFS consensus group, Eldridge, S. M., Chan, C. L., Campbell, M. J., Bond, C. M., Hopewell, S., Thabane, L., & Lancaster, G. A. (2016) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-016-0105-8 · Cited by 2,843 · see citing works
Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice
Lancaster, G. A., Dodd, S., & Williamson, P. R. (2004) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/j..2002.384.doc.x · Cited by 2,572 · see citing works
Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-5966 · Cited by 2,340 · see citing works
Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire
Devilly, G. J., & Borkovec, T. D. (2000) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0005-7916(00)00012-4 · Cited by 2,295 · see citing works
Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets
van Hout, B., Janssen, M. F., Feng, Y.-S., Kohlmann, T., Busschbach, J., Golicki, D., Lloyd, A., Scalone, L., Kind, P., & Pickard, A. S. (2012) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.008 · Cited by 2,153 · see citing works
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease
Heran, B. S., Chen, J. M., Ebrahim, S., Moxham, T., Oldridge, N., Rees, K., Thompson, D. R., & Taylor, R. S. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001800.pub2 · Cited by 1,844 · see citing works
Janssen, M. F., Pickard, A. S., Golicki, D., Gudex, C., Niewada, M., Scalone, L., Swinburn, P., & Busschbach, J. (2013) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0322-4 · Cited by 1,582 · cited 6× · see citing works
“The EQ-5D-5L score can be calculated as a utility value.”
BackgroundInfluentialA short form of the metacognitions questionnaire: properties of the MCQ-30
Wells, A., & Cartwright-Hatton, S. (2004) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(03)00147-5 · Cited by 1,396 · see citing works
(1994) · Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) · Cited by 1,205 · see citing works
Metacognitive therapy for anxiety and depression
Veeraraghavan, V. (2009) · Anxiety, Stress & Coping · doi:10.1080/10615800902833770 · Cited by 1,165 · see citing works
Impact of Event Scale--Revised
Weiss, D. S., & Marmar, C. R. (1997) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t12199-000 · Cited by 760 · see citing works
Gender differences in rumination: A meta-analysis
Johnson, D. P., & Whisman, M. A. (2013) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.03.019 · Cited by 712 · see citing works
Fleming, T., Bavin, L., Lucassen, M., Stasiak, K., Hopkins, S., & Merry, S. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.9275 · Cited by 670 · see citing works
Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation
Taylor, R. S., Dalal, H., Jolly, K., Moxham, T., & Zawada, A. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007130.pub2 · Cited by 623 · see citing works
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease
Anderson, L., Thompson, D. R., Oldridge, N., Zwisler, A., Rees, K., Martin, N., & Taylor, R. S. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001800.pub3 · Cited by 558 · see citing works
Beck, J. G., Grant, D. M., Read, J. P., Clapp, J. D., Coffey, S. F., Miller, L. M., & Palyo, S. A. (2007) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.02.007 · Cited by 506 · see citing works
Dalal, H. M., Doherty, P., & Taylor, R. S. (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.h5000 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Self-citationA review of health utilities using the EQ-5D in studies of cardiovascular disease
Dyer, M., Goldsmith, K., Sharples, L. D., & Buxton, M. J. (2010) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-8-13 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Participation and adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs. A systematic review
Ruano-Ravina, A., Pena-Gil, C., Abu-Assi, E., Raposeiras, S., van 't Hof, A., Meindersma, E., Bossano Prescott, E. I., & González-Juanatey, J. R. (2016) · International Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.120 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
The epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in the UK 2014
Bhatnagar, P., Wickramasinghe, K. K., Williams, J., Rayner, M., & Townsend, N. P. (2015) · Heart · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307516 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation
Anderson, L., Sharp, G. A., Norton, R. J., Dalal, H., Dean, S. G., Jolly, K. B., Cowie, A., Zawada, A., & Taylor, R. S. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007130.pub4 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
The efficacy of metacognitive therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Normann, N., & Morina, N. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02211 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Beatty, L., & Lambert, S. (2013) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.03.004 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Adrian Wells, A. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02621 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Jolly, K. B., Taylor, R. S., Lip, G. Y. H., & Stevens, A. J. (2005) · International Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.11.002 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Neil, A. L., Batterham, P., Christensen, H., Bennett, K., & Griffiths, K. M. (2009) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1050 · Cited by 152 · cited 3× · see citing works
“(2018) conducted a systematic review of digital self-help interventions (n = 11) for depression and anxiety but only two studies reported completion rates (Menzies et al., 2016; Neil et al., 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialPsychological interventions for coronary heart disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
Whalley, B., Thompson, D. R., & Taylor, R. S. (2014) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12529-012-9282-x · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Rao, A., Zecchin, R., Newton, P., Phillips, J., DiGiacomo, M., Denniss, A., & Hickman, L. (2020) · European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1177/2047487319871716 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Lang, C. C., Smith, K. T., Wingham, J., Eyre, V., Greaves, C. J., Warren, F. C., Green, C., Jolly, K. B., Davis, R., Doherty, P., et al. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019649 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citationMartin, C. R., Lewin, R. J. P., & Thompson, D. R. (2003) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/s0165-1781(03)00162-8 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Cardiac rehabilitation in the United Kingdom
Bethell, H. J. N., Lewin, R., & Dalal, H. M. (2008) · Heart · doi:10.1136/hrt.2007.134338 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Lundgren, J. G., Dahlström, Ö., Andersson, G., Jaarsma, T., Kärner Köhler, A., & Johansson, P. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.5556 · Cited by 104 · cited 1× · see citing works
“If we assume a 50–70% completion (of at least four modules) this compares favorably against other forms of self-help, Lundgren et al. (2016) evaluated guided web-based CBT for heart failure therapy with depression (n = 50).”
ResultNordahl, H. M., Borkovec, T. D., Hagen, R., Kennair, L. E. O., Hjemdal, O., Solem, S., Hansen, B., Haseth, S., & Wells, A. (2018) · BJPsych Open · doi:10.1192/bjo.2018.54 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Adrian Wells, A., Reeves, D., Capobianco, L., Heal, C., Davies, L. M., Heagerty, A. M., Doherty, P., & Fisher, P. (2021) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.120.052428 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citationThe National Audit of Cardiac Rehabilitation : Annual Statistical Report 2016
Doherty, P., Petre, C., Onion, N., Harrison, A., Dale, V., Fell, J., Cardy, K., & Tang, L. H. (2015) · White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Self-citationEuropean Society of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2019 (Executive Summary)
On behalf of the Atlas Writing Group, Timmis, A., Townsend, N. P., Gale, C. P., Torbica, A., Lettino, M., Petersen, S. E., Mossialos, E. A., Maggioni, A. P., Kazakiewicz, D., et al. (2020) · European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes · doi:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcz065 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Callesen, P., Reeves, D., Heal, C., & Wells, A. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-64577-1 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationMenzies, R., O'Brian, S., Lowe, R., Packman, A., & Onslow, M. (2016) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2016.06.002 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
McPhillips, R., Salmon, P., Wells, A., & Fisher, P. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02288 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationAdrian Wells, A., McNicol, K., Reeves, D., Salmon, P., Davies, L. M., Heagerty, A. M., Doherty, P., McPhillips, R., Anderson, R., Faija, C., et al. (2018) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2826-x · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationGender differences in the factors predicting initial engagement at cardiac rehabilitation
Galdas, P., Harrison, A. S., & Doherty, P. (2018) · Open Heart · doi:10.1136/openhrt-2017-000764 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationLambert, S., Beatty, L., McElduff, P., Levesque, J. V., Lawsin, C. R., Jacobsen, P. B., Turner, J., & Girgis, A. (2017) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.039 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Faija, C. L., Reeves, D., Heal, C., & Wells, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01064 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationFaija, C., Reeves, D., Heal, C., Capobianco, L., Anderson, R., & Adrian Wells, A. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02109 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationLancaster (2004) · doi:10.1111/j.2002.384.doc.x
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- British Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. (2017). The BACPR standards and core components for cardiovascular disease prevention and rehabilitation (3rd ed.). http://www.bacpr.com/resources/BACPR_Standards_and_Core_Components_2017.pdf
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ski, C. F., Taylor, R. S., McGuigan, K., Long, L., Lambert, J. D., Richards, S. H., & Thompson, D. R. (2024) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd013508.pub3 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Adrian Wells, A., Reeves, D., Heal, C., Fisher, P., Doherty, P., Davies, L. M., Heagerty, A. M., & Capobianco, L. (2023) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004161 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationWells, A., Reeves, D., Heal, C., Davies, L. M., Shields, G. E., Heagerty, A., Fisher, P., Doherty, P., & Capobianco, L. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.886407 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationAdrian Wells, A., Reeves, D., Fisher, P., Davies, L. M., Shields, G., Doherty, P., Heagerty, A. M., Heal, C., Brown, L., & Capobianco, L. (2024) · Programme Grants for Applied Research · doi:10.3310/tmja2644 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationLarionov, K., Petrova, E., Demirbuga, N., Werth, O., Breitner, M. H., Gebhardt, P., Caldarone, F., Duncker, D., Westhoff-Bleck, M., Sensenhauser, A., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1138475 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Zhang, M. X., Yu Qing, W. U., & Wu, A. M. S. (2025) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108479 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Zhao, Y., Luo, Q., Ren, P., Zhang, R., Wen, Y., Lai, H., Fan, Y., Liu, X., Zhou, J., & Wu, X. (2026) · Cell & Bioscience · doi:10.1186/s13578-026-01535-w · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Dammen, T., Tunheim, K., Munkhaugen, J., Klungsøyr, O., & Papageorgiou, C. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1226539 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Notash, F. D., Vafa, M. A., & Farzadi, L. (2023) · Utāq-i bāzargānī. · doi:10.61186/ijpb.17.2.143
Tan, G., Yuan, M., Ren, B., He, L. I., Zeng, R., & Zhang, W. (2026) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2026.112608
Adrian Wells, A., Belcher, A., Reeves, D., Doherty, P., Wilson, P. M., & Capobianco, L. (2026) · Frontiers in Health Services · doi:10.3389/frhs.2026.1793055
Self-citation
- Authors
- Wells, A., Reeves, D., Heal, C., Fisher, P., Doherty, P., Davies, L., Heagerty, A., & Capobianco, L.
- Affiliations
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- University of York (GB)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Manchester Royal Infirmary (GB)
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Health Psychology
- Published
- 2022-05
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 366-377
- ISSN
- 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-7810
- PMC
- PMC9037049
- OpenAlex
- W4224942355
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Health Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health Research (RP-PG-1211-20011)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- metacognitive therapy, anxiety, depression, cardiovascular disease, cardiac rehabilitation, telephone-delivered intervention, feasibility, acceptability, psychological distress, psychological intervention
- MeSH terms
- Anxiety, Cardiovascular Diseases, Depression, Feasibility Studies, Humans, State Medicine, Single-Blind Method
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review