Cited by 115Cardiac Health and Mental HealthAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

A confirmatory factor analysis of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in coronary care patients following acute myocardial infarction

Open access
Martin, Colin R., Lewin, Robert J.P., Thompson, David R.·2003·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

The utility of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) as a screening instrument for coronary care patients following acute myocardial infarction (MI) was investigated. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted on the HADS to determine its psychometric properties in 335 MI patients over three observation points (1 week, 6 weeks and 6 months). Internal and test-retest reliabilities of the HADS total and HADS sub-scale scores were generally found to be acceptable. The underlying factor structure of the HADS comprised three distinct factors. Support was found for the use of the HADS sub-scales to assess dimensions of anhedonia, psychic anxiety and psychomotor agitation. The HADS may be a useful screening instrument to assess post-MI patients for symptoms of psychological distress. Further research is required to determine the three-factor structure of the HADS in other clinical groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0165-1781(03)00162-8

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin, C. R., Lewin, R. J. P., & Thompson, D. R.
Affiliations
University of York (GB)
Corresponding author
Martin, Colin R.
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-08
Volume
120
Issue
1
Pages
85-94
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084605848
Cited by
115
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, acute myocardial infarction, psychological distress screening, psychometric properties, factor structure, anhedonia, psychic anxiety, psychomotor agitation, test-retest reliability, internal consistency
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Coronary Care Units, Depression, England, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Psychomotor Agitation, Sick Role, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review