Cited by 139Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceElder Abuse and NeglectStalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment

A Contextual Analysis of Battered Women’s Safety Planning

Goodkind, Jessica R., Sullivan, Cris M., Bybee, Deborah I.·2004·Violence Against Women

Abstract

This study explored a frequently overlooked area of research—battered women’s safety planning strategies. Interviews were conducted with 160 women who experienced violence from an intimate partner and had at least one child aged 5 to 12. Women employed numerous and diverse strategies in attempting to keep themselves and their children safe. Their choices depended on several contextual factors, including severity of violence and relationship with assailant. Although contacting domestic violence programs and staying at domestic violence shelters were most likely to improve women’s situations, no strategies were universally effective. Clusters of safety planning strategies were identified to further understand women’s actions. Women who experienced the most violence and had assailants who engaged in the most behaviors indicative of potential lethality were most actively engaged in safety planning but remained in serious danger. These findings highlight the importance of community response and support in protecting survivors and holding assailants accountable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077801204264368

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goodkind, J. R., Sullivan, C. M., & Bybee, D. I.
Affiliations
  • California State University, East Bay (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Venue
Violence Against Women
Published
2004-05
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
514-533
ISSN
  • 1077-8012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8448
OpenAlex
W2132480674
Cited by
139
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Violence Against Women (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Keywords
battered women, safety planning, intimate partner violence, domestic violence, women's shelters, domestic violence programs, community support, survivor safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review