Cited by 572Mental Health Research TopicsPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 194 of the 195 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Parsing the heterogeneity of impulsivity: A meta-analytic review of the behavioral implications of the UPPS for psychopathology.

Abstract

The construct of impulsivity is implicated in a wide variety of psychopathology. However, the heterogeneous factors or subcomponents that differentially predict outcomes are still in the process of being parsed. The present review and meta-analysis focuses on the psychopathological correlates of the Negative Urgency, (lack of) Premeditation, (lack of) perseverance, Sensation Seeking, and Positive Urgency (UPPS/UPPS-P; Whiteside & Lynam, 2001). which provides a relatively new model of impulsivity that posits 5 potentially overlapping pathways to impulsive action. The present meta-analysis included 115 studies that used the UPPS, with a total of 40,432 participants. Findings suggested that the Negative Urgency pathway to impulsivity demonstrated the greatest correlational effect sizes across all forms of psychopathology, with the Positive Urgency pathway demonstrating a pattern of correlations similar to that of Negative Urgency. These findings raise questions regarding the conceptual and practical separability of these pathways. Lack of Premeditation and Lack of Perseverance also demonstrated similar correlational patterns, suggesting that further investigation of the distinctiveness of these pathways is warranted.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/pas0000111

Cites

194 of 194 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 195 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 572

Metadata

Authors
Berg, J. M., Latzman, R. D., Bliwise, N. G., & Lilienfeld, S. O.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Georgia State University (US)
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
2015
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
1129-1146
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W2332638583
Cited by
572
References
195
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 98 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 4
FWCI
56.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
impulsivity, UPP, UPPS-P, negative urgency, positive urgency, lack of premeditation, lack of perseverance, sensation seeking, psychopathology, behavioral effects
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Models, Psychological, Psychological Tests, Psychopathology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review