Cited by 373Personality Traits and PsychologyPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

A test of the four-factor model of impulsivity-related traits

Miller, Joshua, Flory, Kate, Lynam, Donald, Leukefeld, Carl·2003·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00122-8

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, J., Flory, K., Lynam, D., & Leukefeld, C.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, Joshua
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-06
Volume
34
Issue
8
Pages
1403-1418
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087583921
Cited by
373
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 22
FWCI
8.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Kentucky
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
impulsivity, urgency, sensation seeking, premeditation, perseverance, personality traits, externalizing problems, internalizing psychopathology, intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review