The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A self-report measure for the ICD-11 dimensional trait model proposal: The Personality Inventory for ICD-11.
Open accessAbstract
Proposed for the 11th edition of the World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) is a dimensional trait model for the classification of personality disorder (Tyrer, Reed, & Crawford, 2015). The ICD-11 proposal consists of 5 broad domains: negative affective, detachment, dissocial, disinhibition, and anankastic (Mulder, Horwood, Tyrer, Carter, & Joyce, 2016). Several field trials have examined this proposal, yet none has included a direct measure of the trait model. The purpose of the current study was to develop and provide initial validation for the Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD), a self-report measure of this proposed 5-domain maladaptive trait model. Item selection and scale construction proceeded through 3 initial data collections assessing potential item performance. Two subsequent studies were conducted for scale validation. In Study 1, the PiCD was evaluated in a sample of 259 MTurk participants (who were or had been receiving mental health treatment) with respect to 2 measures of general personality structure: The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised and the 5-Dimensional Personality Test. In Study 2, the PiCD was evaluated in an additional sample of 285 participants with respect to 2 measures of maladaptive personality traits: The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 and the Computerized Adaptive Test for Personality Disorders. Study 3 provides an item-level exploratory structural equation model with the combined samples from Studies 1 and 2. The results are discussed with respect to the validity of the measure and the potential benefits for future research in having a direct, self-report measure of the ICD-11 trait proposal. (PsycINFO Database Record
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309 · Cited by 6,567
Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments.
Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286 · Cited by 3,970
Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5
Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291711002674 · Cited by 1,908
Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2019) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000626 · Cited by 1,470
Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling
Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2003) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1003_1 · Cited by 1,231
Conducting Clinical Research Using Crowdsourced Convenience Samples
Chandler, J., & Shapiro, D. (2016) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093623 · Cited by 1,072
Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2008) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2008.07.002 · Cited by 1,018
Self-citationPlate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: Shifting to a dimensional model.
Widiger, T. A., & Trull, T. J. (2007) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.62.2.71 · Cited by 957
Self-citationThe five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review
Saulsman, L. M., & Page, A. C. (2004) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2002.09.001 · Cited by 915
Classification, assessment, prevalence, and effect of personality disorder
Tyrer, P., Reed, G. M., & Crawford, M. J. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61995-4 · Cited by 656 · cited 11×
“…rigidity, and hypochondriasis (Tyrer, 1988b), whereas ICD-11 anankastic concerns more specifically the control and regulation of behavior, including such traits as perfectionism, deliberativeness, orderliness, and concern with following rules (Mulder et al., 2016; Tyrer et al., 2011, 2015).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Cited by
Maj, M., Stein, D. J., Parker, G., Zimmerman, M., Fava, G. A., De Hert, M., Demyttenaere, K., McIntyre, R. S., Widiger, T., & Wittchen, H. (2020) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20771 · Cited by 435
Self-citationTyrer, P., Mulder, R., Kim, Y.-R., & Crawford, M. J. (2019) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095736 · Cited by 369
Zimmermann, J., Kerber, A., Rek, K., Hopwood, C. J., & Krueger, R. F. (2019) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-019-1079-z · Cited by 322
Application of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders
Bach, B., & First, M. B. (2018) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-018-1908-3 · Cited by 292
Bach, B., Kerber, A., Aluja, A., Bastiaens, T., Keeley, J. W., Claes, L., Fossati, A., Gutierrez, F., Oliveira, S. E. S., Pires, R., et al. (2020) · Psychopathology · doi:10.1159/000507589 · Cited by 204
Metadata
- Authors
- Oltmanns, J. R., & Widiger, T. A.
- Venue
- Psychological Assessment
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 154-169
- ISSN
- 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-134X
- OpenAlex
- W2590907602
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 31.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A self-report measure for the ICD-11 dimensional trait model proposal: The Personality Inventory for ICD-11. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/pas0000459
- The paper
- Oltmanns, J. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2018). A self-report measure for the ICD-11 dimensional trait model proposal: The Personality Inventory for ICD-11. Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000459
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
