Cited by 915Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyMental Health Research Topics

The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review

Saulsman, Lisa M., Page, Andrew C.·2004·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

The current meta-analysis reviews research examining the relationships between each of the five-factor model personality dimensions and each of the 10 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) personality disorder diagnostic categories. Effect sizes representing the relationships between these two constructs were compiled from 15 independent samples. Results were analyzed both within each individual personality disorder category and across personality disorders, indicating how personality disorders are different and similar, respectively, with regard to underlying personality traits. In terms of how personality disorders differ, the results showed that each disorder displays a five-factor model profile that is meaningful and predictable given its unique diagnostic criteria. With regard to their similarities, the findings revealed that the most prominent and consistent personality dimensions underlying a large number of the personality disorders are positive associations with Neuroticism and negative associations with Agreeableness. Extraversion appears to be a more discriminating dimension, as indicated by prominent but directionally variable associations with the personality disorders. The implications of these meta-analytic findings for clinical application and the advancement of future research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2002.09.001

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To the degree that antagonism is central to all narcissistic presentations, narcissism should overlap primarily with other disorders characterized by antagonism, such as antisocial, psychopathy, and paranoid PDs.

    “To the degree that antagonism is central to all narcissistic presentations (e.g., grandiosity, entitlement, callousness, manipulativeness), narcissism should overlap primarily with other disorders characterized by traits from this domain, such as antisocial, psychopathy, and paranoid PDs (e.g., see Saulsman &Page 2004 andSamuel &Widiger 2008a for meta-analytic reviews).”

    From Controversies in Narcissism (2017) · cites this paper as Saulsman &Page 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saulsman, L. M., & Page, A. C.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Page, Andrew C.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-01
Volume
23
Issue
8
Pages
1055-1085
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146820018
Cited by
915
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 67
FWCI
19.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2005-05-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
Big Five personality traits, personality disorders, neuroticism, agreeableness, extraversion, personality disorder diagnosis
MeSH terms
Feeding and Eating Disorders, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Models, Psychological, Neurotic Disorders, Personality Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review