Cited by 48Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Concordance in PTSD symptom change between DSM-5 versions of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5) and PTSD Checklist (PCL-5)

Open access
Lee, Daniel J., Weathers, Frank W., Thompson-Hollands, Johanna, Sloan, Denise M., Marx, Brian P.·2022·Psychological Assessment

Abstract

= .878), and similar associations with improvements in measures of depression and psychosocial functioning. However, the two measures did not produce identical estimates of symptom change. Estimates of symptom improvement were somewhat less concordant at posttreatment follow-up assessments; by the 12-month posttreatment assessment, changes in CAPS-5 scores from baseline indicated somewhat greater symptom improvement than changes in PCL-5 scores (CAPS-5 ESsg = -0.67, PCL-5 ESsg = -0.53). Collectively, results indicate that CAPS-5 and PCL-5 scores produce similar but not identical estimates of PTSD symptom change. Thus, although PCL-5 scores closely approximate symptom change estimated by CAPS-5 scores, the two measures are not interchangeable. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/pas0001130

Cites

21 of 22 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.).
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
  3. Brown TA (Ed.). (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press.
  4. Kline RB (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
  5. Lipsey MW, & Wilson DB (2001). Practical meta-analysis. SAGE Publications.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, D. J., Weathers, F. W., Thompson-Hollands, J., Sloan, D. M., & Marx, B. P.
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
2022-06
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
604-609
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W4226150870
Cited by
48
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 2
FWCI
8.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
US Department of Veterans Affairs (I01CX000467, IK2 CX001589)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, PTSD symptom change, Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale, CAPS-5, PTSD Checklist, PCL-5, measurement concordance, depression, psychosocial functioning, treatment follow-up
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans, Databases, Factual, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review