Cited by 19Media Influence and HealthPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentEthics, Aesthetics, and Art

Fiction and morality: Investigating the associations between reading exposure, empathy, morality, and moral judgment.

Black, Jessica E., Barnes, Jennifer L.·2021·Psychology of Popular Media

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/ppm0000281

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fiction often adopts narrative techniques (e.g., present tense and first-person point of view) that can encourage emotional connections between a reader and fictional characters, enhancing the potential for feelings of empathy.

    “Indeed, fiction often adopts narrative techniques (e.g., present tense and first-person point of view), which can encourage emotional connections between a reader and fictional character(s), thus enhancing the potential for feelings of empathy (Black et al., 2021; Nikolajeva, 2014).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Black, J. E., & Barnes, J. L.
Venue
Psychology of Popular Media
Published
2021-04
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
149-164
ISSN
  • 2689-6567 (ISSN-L)
  • 2689-6575
OpenAlex
W3009433351
Cited by
19
References
67
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5
FWCI
28.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology of Popular Media (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
Keywords
fiction, morality, moral judgment, empathy, literature and morality, moral development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review