Cited by 397Cognitive Abilities and TestingChild Abuse and TraumaNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Cognitive adaptations to stressful environments: When childhood adversity enhances adult executive function.

Open access
Mittal, Chiraag, Griskevicius, Vladas, Simpson, Jeffry A., Sung, Sooyeon, Young, Ethan S.·2015·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Can growing up in a stressful childhood environment enhance certain cognitive functions? Drawing participants from higher-income and lower-income backgrounds, we tested how adults who grew up in harsh or unpredictable environments fared on 2 types of executive function tasks: inhibition and shifting. People who experienced unpredictable childhoods performed worse at inhibition (overriding dominant responses), but performed better at shifting (efficiently switching between different tasks). This finding is consistent with the notion that shifting, but not inhibition, is especially useful in unpredictable environments. Importantly, differences in executive function between people who experienced unpredictable versus predictable childhoods emerged only when they were tested in uncertain contexts. This catalyst suggests that some individual differences related to early life experience are manifested under conditions of uncertainty in adulthood. Viewed as a whole, these findings indicate that adverse childhood environments do not universally impair mental functioning, but can actually enhance specific types of cognitive performance in the face of uncertainty.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/pspi0000028

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mittal, C., Griskevicius, V., Simpson, J. A., Sung, S., & Young, E. S.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2015-10
Volume
109
Issue
4
Pages
604-621
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2272950013
Cited by
397
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
FWCI
31.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1057482)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
childhood adversity, executive function, inhibition, cognitive flexibility, task switching, uncertainty, unpredictable environments, early life experience, cognitive adaptation, individual differences
MeSH terms
Adult Survivors of Child Adverse Events, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Stress, Psychological, Uncertainty, Young Adult, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review