The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developmental structure of personality and interests: A four-wave, 8-year longitudinal study.
Abstract
Personality traits and vocational interests capture different aspects of human individuality that intersect in certain ways. In this longitudinal study, we examined developmental relations between the Big 5 traits and RIASEC vocational interests over 4 timepoints from late adolescence to young adulthood (age 16-24) in a sample of Icelandic youth (N = 485) well-representative of the total student population. Results showed that interests and personality traits were similarly stable over time, but showed different patterns of mean-level change. There was evidence of personality maturation but a lack of cumulative changes in interest levels. For the most part, gender differences in developmental trends were minimal. In addition, latent growth curve analyses revealed broad and specific correlated changes between personality and interests. Changes in general factors of personality and interests were moderately related (r = .32), but stronger correlated changes were found among specific personality-interest pairs that share situational content. Overall, results reveal how interests and personality are related across different types of continuity and change. While there was little correspondence between group-level changes, substantial correlated change occurred at the individual level. This means that when a person's personality changes, their interests tend to change in predictable ways (and vice versa). Integrative theories that link different aspects of psychological functioning…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It is important to note, however, that although vocational interests and personality traits might share similar psychological processes (Hoff, Song, Einarsdóttir, et al., 2020;Mount et al., 2005), the two phenomena describe distinct aspects of human individuality (see also Roemer et al., 2023).”
From The German O*NET Interest Profiler Short Form (2023) · cites this paper as Hoff, Song, Einarsdóttir, et al., 2020
Citations
Cites
Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1 · Cited by 3,318
Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x · Cited by 2,361
Latent Variable Modeling of Differences and Changes with Longitudinal Data
McArdle, J. J. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163612 · Cited by 1,952
Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits
Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.2.219 · Cited by 1,829
Missing Data: Five Practical Guidelines
Newman, D. A. (2014) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428114548590 · Cited by 1,411
Schmitt, D. P., Realo, A., Voracek, M., & Allik, J. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.168 · Cited by 1,391
Newman, D. A. (2003) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428103254673 · Cited by 626
Life Events and Personality Trait Change.
Bleidorn, W., Hopwood, C. J., & Lucas, R. E. (2018) · Journal of personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12286 · Cited by 588
Processes of Personality Development in Adulthood: The TESSERA Framework
Wrzus, C., & Roberts, B. W. (2017) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868316652279 · Cited by 559
Lodi-Smith, J., & Roberts, B. W. (2007) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868306294590 · Cited by 513
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The German O*NET Interest Profiler Short Form
Roemer, L., Lewis, P., & Rounds, J. (2023) · Psychological Test Adaptation and Development · doi:10.1027/2698-1866/a000048 · Cited by 8
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoff, K. A., Song, Q. C., Einarsdóttir, S., Briley, D. A., & Rounds, J.
- ORCID
- Einarsdóttir, Sif
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1044-1064
- ISSN
- 1939-1315
- 0022-3514
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 13
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review