Cited by 9Spinal Cord Injury ResearchResilience and Mental HealthMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Effect of the environment on participation in spinal cord injuries/disorders: The mediating impact of resilience, grief, and self-efficacy.

Locatelli, Sara M., Etingen, Bella, Miskevics, Scott, LaVela, Sherri L.·2017·Rehabilitation Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to test the hypothesis that the influence of environmental barriers on participation will be fully mediated by psychosocial factors (resilience, grief or loss, and self-efficacy) among individuals with spinal cord injuries and disorders. METHOD: This was a cross-sectional mailed survey with a national sample of veterans with spinal cord injuries and disorders (n = 565), which included measures of demographics, perceived environmental barriers, participation, resilience, grief or loss, and self-efficacy. Data were analyzed using a latent variable path analysis; the model fit was assessed using χ2, normed χ2, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA; <0.07), Comparative Fit Index (CFI; ≥0.95), and Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI; ≥0.95). RESULTS: Participants were mostly male (93.9%), Caucasian or White (74.2%), and, on average, 62.4 years of age (SD = 10.48). Almost 62% had paraplegia, and 38.3% had a motor or sensory complete injury. The hypothesized model showed excellent fit, χ2(42) = 153.40, normed χ2 = 3.65, RMSEA = 0.07, CFI = 0.96, TLI = 0.95. To assess for full mediation, a direct path was added from environment to participation. This model showed nearly identical fit, χ2(41) = 153.39, normed χ2 = 3.74, RMSEA = 0.07, CFI = 0.96, TLI = 0.95; the path from environment to participation was not significant, unstandardized coefficient = -0.04, p = .92. Examination of indirect effects of the hypothesized model demonstrated that environment significantly influences participation through psychosocial factors, unstandardized coefficient = -4.85, p < .001. Together these results support full mediation. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion the present study expands upon past research by suggesting that perceived environmental barriers play a role in internal factors, such as resilience and self-efficacy, which in turn influence participation. Interventions to improve environmental barriers may be warranted, but attention must also be paid to resilience, grief or loss, and self-efficacy to increase participation. (PsycINFO Database Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/rep0000153

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Locatelli, S. M., Etingen, B., Miskevics, S., & LaVela, S. L.
Affiliations
United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Venue
Rehabilitation Psychology
Published
2017-08
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
334-344
ISSN
  • 0090-5550 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1544
OpenAlex
W2622390854
Cited by
9
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Rehabilitation Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Research Development (RRP 13-248)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
spinal cord injury, spinal cord disorders, participation, environmental barriers, resilience, grief and loss, self-efficacy, veterans, mediation, psychosocial factors, paraplegia, adaptation to disability, quality of life, social participation (health and rehabilitation), physical activity, interpersonal relationships, anxiety, post-traumatic stress
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Environment, Female, Grief, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Spinal Cord Injuries, United States, Veterans, Self Efficacy, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review