Cited by 21Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Episodic retrieval for model-based evaluation in sequential decision tasks.

Open access
Zhou, Corey Y., Talmi, Deborah, Daw, Nathaniel D., Mattar, Marcelo G.·2025·Psychological Review

Abstract

It has long been hypothesized that episodic memory supports adaptive decision making by enabling mental simulation of future events. Yet, attempts to characterize this process are surprisingly rare. On one hand, memory research is often carried out in settings that are far removed from ecological contexts of decision making. On the other hand, models of adaptive choice only invoke episodic memory in highly stylized terms, if at all. To address these gaps, we propose TCM-SR, a novel process-level model that grounds model-based evaluation in empirically informed dynamics of episodic recall. In this model, the probability of retrieving each available memory is governed by the successor representation, a biologically plausible world model in reinforcement learning. The evolution of these probabilities based on past retrievals, in turn, is dictated by the temporal context model, a prominent model of episodic retrieval. Through simulations and analytical derivations, we show that the patterns of episodic retrieval suggested by this model enables flexible computation of decision variables. On this basis, a number of previously described features of episodic memory might serve an adaptive purpose in sequential decision making. For instance, we show that the contiguity effect, a well-known bias in episodic retrieval, enables mental simulation via model-based rollouts to inform decisions. We also show that backward retrieval and emotional modulation improve generalization and the efficiency of decisions given limited experience. By bridging computational models across these two domains, we make several theoretical and empirical predictions linking episodic memory to adaptive choice in sequential tasks. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/rev0000505

Cites

36 of 37 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [6]6. Kumaran, D. & McClelland, J. L. (2012). Generalization through the recurrent interaction of episodic memories: A model of the hippocampal system. Psychological Review , 119 (3), 573 -616. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0028681
  2. [8]8. Lengyel, M. & Dayan, P. (2007). Hippocampal contributions to control: The third way. In J. Platt, D. Koller, Y. Singer, & S. Roweis (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 20, pp. 889 -896). Curran Associates.
  3. [33]33. Pritzel, A., Uria, B., Srinivasan, S., Badia, A. P., Vinyals, O., Hassabis, D., Wierstra, D., & Blundell, C. (2017). Neural episodic control [Conference session]. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning.
  4. [35]35. Ritter, S., Wang, J., Kurth-Nelson, Z., Jayakumar, S., Blundell, C., Pascanu, R., & Botvinick, M. (2018). Been there, done that: Meta-learning with episodic recall [Conference session]. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, C. Y., Talmi, D., Daw, N. D., & Mattar, M. G.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Princeton University (US)
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
2025-01
Volume
132
Issue
1
Pages
18-49
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W4405906861
Cited by
21
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Science Foundation (IIS-1822571)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
episodic memory, episodic memory retrieval, model-based decision making, sequential decision making, successor representation, mental simulation, emotional modulation, adaptive choice, memory generalization
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Humans, Models, Psychological, Mental Recall, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review