Cited by 259Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesSleep and Wakefulness Research

Complementary learning systems

Open access
O’Reilly, Randall C., Bhattacharyya, Rajan, Howard, Michael D., Ketz, Nicholas·2014·Cognitive Science

Abstract

This paper reviews the fate of the central ideas behind the complementary learning systems (CLS) framework as originally articulated in McClelland, McNaughton, and O’Reilly (1995) . This framework explains why the brain requires two differentially specialized learning and memory systems, and it nicely specifies their central properties (i.e., the hippocampus as a sparse, pattern‐separated system for rapidly learning episodic memories, and the neocortex as a distributed, overlapping system for gradually integrating across episodes to extract latent semantic structure). We review the application of the CLS framework to a range of important topics, including the following: the basic neural processes of hippocampal memory encoding and recall, conjunctive encoding, human recognition memory, consolidation of initial hippocampal learning in cortex, dynamic modulation of encoding versus recall, and the synergistic interactions between hippocampus and neocortex. Overall, the CLS framework remains a vital theoretical force in the field, with the empirical data over the past 15 years generally confirming its key principles.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01214.x

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human memory leaves most experiences unconsolidated unless repeatedly activated.

    “RecMem's design mirrors human memory: most experiences remain unconsolidated unless repeatedly activated (Atkinson and Shiffrin, 1968; O'Reilly et al., 2014; McClelland et al., 1995).”

    From RecMem: Recurrence-based Memory Consolidation for Efficient and Effective Long-Running LLM Agents (2026) · cites this paper as O'Reilly et al., 2014

    Section 4 describes hippocampal replay as a way to train the slower-learning cortex, and §4.1 discusses replay’s role in consolidation. But the paper does not say that most human experiences remain unconsolidated or that repeated activation is required for an experience to consolidate. The indexed passages provide no page number. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The hippocampus plays a vital role in learning episodic memory by encoding them through a process that separates similar personal experiences and stores them distinctly, thereby minimizing interference between different episodic memory.

    “The hippocampus in the brain plays a vital role in learning episodic memory by encoding them through a process that separates similar personal experiences and stores them distinctly, thereby minimizing interference between different episodic memory [77, 78, 79].”

    From Human-inspired Perspectives: A Survey on AI Long-term Memory (2024) · cites this paper as [79]

  • The hippocampus is involved in the complex process of retrieving specific memory based on cues.

    “The hippocampus of brain is involved in the complex process of retrieving specific memory based on cues [77, 79].”

    From Human-inspired Perspectives: A Survey on AI Long-term Memory (2024) · cites this paper as [79]

  • The hippocampus and cortex of the brain are involved in the encoding of memory, with the hippocampus encoding unique episodic information through its pattern separation properties and the cortex encoding more generalized information through its distributed representations.

    “The hippocampus and cortex of the brain are involved in the encoding of memory, with the hippocampus encoding unique episodic information through its pattern separation properties and the cortex encoding more generalized information through its distributed representations [77, 78, 96, 79].”

    From Human-inspired Perspectives: A Survey on AI Long-term Memory (2024) · cites this paper as [79]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. R. C. O'Reilly et al. ⁄ Cognitive Science 38 (2014) 15516709, 2014, 6, · DOI
  2. Hinton, G. E., McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1986). Distributed representations. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, & P. R. Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing. Volume 1: Foundations (Chapter 3, pp. 77-109). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  3. R. C. O'Reilly et al. ⁄ Cognitive Science 38 (2014) 1245 15516709, 2014, 6, · DOI
  4. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1986). A distributed model of human learning and memory. In J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart, & P. R. Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing. Volume 2: Psychologi- cal and biological models (pp. 170-215). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  5. R. C. O'Reilly et al. ⁄ Cognitive Science 38 (2014)
  6. O'Reilly, R. C., & McClelland, J. L. (1994). Hippocampal conjunctive encoding, storage, and recall: Avoiding a tradeoff. Hippocampus, 4(6), 661-682.
  7. O'Reilly, R. C., & Munakata, Y. (2000). Computational explorations in cognitive neuroscience: Understanding the mind by simulating the brain. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  8. Susanne, D., & Jan, B. (2010). The memory function of sleep. Nature Reviews, 11(2), 114-126.
  9. R. C. O'Reilly et al. ⁄ Cognitive Science 38 (2014) 15516709, 2014, 6, · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O’Reilly, R. C., Bhattacharyya, R., Howard, M. D., & Ketz, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • HRL Laboratories (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
O’Reilly, Randall C.
Venue
Cognitive Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-12-05
Volume
38
Issue
6
Pages
1229-1248
ISSN
  • 0364-0213 (ISSN-L)
  • 1551-6709
OpenAlex
W2159345153
Cited by
259
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (HR0011)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
complementary learning systems, hippocampus, neocortex, episodic memory, pattern separation, sparse coding, memory consolidation, recognition memory, memory encoding, memory retrieval, hippocampal-neocortical interaction
MeSH terms
Hippocampus, Humans, Learning, Models, Neurological, Neural Pathways, Neocortex, Recognition, Psychology, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review