Cited by 17Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesSport Psychology and PerformancePsychological Treatments and Assessments

Effectiveness of an online acceptance and commitment therapy programme for perfectionism in soccer players: A randomized control trial.

Open access
Watson, Dean R., Hill, Andrew P., Madigan, Daniel J., Donachie, Tracy C.·2024·Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology

Abstract

There is currently limited understanding of how to reduce perfectionism in sport. With research outside of sport as impetus, in the current study we evaluated the effectiveness of an online ACT-based intervention for reducing perfectionism and improving pre-competition emotions in soccer players. Following a pre-registered protocol, eighty-one female soccer players (M age = 24.28 years, SD = 6.77) were randomly allocated to either an intervention group (n = 41) or a waitlist control group (n = 40). The intervention group had access to a set of online ACT-based modules for 8-weeks. Athletes completed measures of trait perfectionism, perfectionism cognitions, and pre-competition emotions pre-intervention and post-intervention. A 2 (group) x 2 (time) ANOVA revealed significant interaction effects for trait perfectionism, perfectionism cognitions, and pre-competition emotions. Following the intervention, the two groups displayed significant mean differences for trait perfectionism, perfectionism cognitions, and almost all pre-competition emotions. However, due to lower reliability of some instruments, findings regarding post-competition emotions were discounted. The findings suggest that online ACT-based interventions may be a viable and effective way to reduce perfectionism in soccer players (but not necessarily improving pre-competition emotions).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/spy0000333

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watson, D. R., Hill, A. P., Madigan, D. J., & Donachie, T. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Greater Manchester (GB)
  • York St John University (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Watson, Dean R.
Venue
Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology
Published
2024-02
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
5-22
ISSN
  • 2157-3905 (ISSN-L)
  • 2157-3913
OpenAlex
W4389453439
Cited by
16
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sport Exercise and Performance Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Research at York St John (York St John University) (acceptedVersion)
  • UBIR (University of Greater Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, perfectionism, soccer players, online intervention, pre-competition emotions, female athletes, sport psychology intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review