Cited by 25Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsMathematics Education and Pedagogy

Using a general problem-solving strategy to promote transfer.

Youssef-Shalala, Amina, Ayres, Paul, Schubert, Carina, Sweller, John·2014·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

Abstract

Cognitive load theory was used to hypothesize that a general problem-solving strategy based on a make-as-many-moves-as-possible heuristic could facilitate problem solutions for transfer problems. In four experiments, school students were required to learn about a topic through practice with a general problem-solving strategy, through a conventional problem solving strategy or by studying worked examples. In Experiments 1 and 2 using junior high school students learning geometry, low knowledge students in the general problem-solving group scored significantly higher on near or far transfer tests than the conventional problem-solving group. In Experiment 3, an advantage for a general problem-solving group over a group presented worked examples was obtained on far transfer tests using the same curriculum materials, again presented to junior high school students. No differences between conditions were found in Experiments 1, 2, or 3 using test problems similar to the acquisition problems. Experiment 4 used senior high school students studying economics and found the general problem-solving group scored significantly higher than the conventional problem-solving group on both similar and transfer tests. It was concluded that the general problem-solving strategy was helpful for novices, but not for students that had access to domain-specific knowledge.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/xap0000021

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pointing out to students that a generic-cognitive skill should be used on a particular class of specific problems can be instructionally effective.

    “Pointing out to students that a genericcognitive skill should be used on a particular class of specific problems can be instructionally effective (Youssef-Shalala et al. 2014).”

    From Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later (2019) · cites this paper as Youssef-Shalala et al. 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Youssef-Shalala, A., Ayres, P., Schubert, C., & Sweller, J.
Affiliations
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
Published
2014
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
215-231
ISSN
  • 1076-898X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2192
OpenAlex
W2334764002
Cited by
25
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
transfer of learning, cognitive load theory, worked examples, geometry learning, economics learning, novice learners, domain knowledge, near transfer, far transfer
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Curriculum, Education, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Problem Solving, Students, Transfer, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review