Cited by 105Multisensory perception and integrationBiochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesTactile and Sensory Interactions

A crossmodal role for audition in taste perception

Yan, Kimberly S., Dando, Robin·2015·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Abstract

Our sense of taste can be influenced by our other senses, with several groups having explored the effects of olfactory, visual, or tactile stimulation on what we perceive as taste. Research into multisensory, or crossmodal perception has rarely linked our sense of taste with that of audition. In our study, 48 participants in a crossover experiment sampled multiple concentrations of solutions of 5 prototypic tastants, during conditions with or without broad spectrum auditory stimulation, simulating that of airline cabin noise. Airline cabins are an unusual environment, in which food is consumed routinely under extreme noise conditions, often over 85 dB, and in which the perceived quality of food is often criticized. Participants rated the intensity of solutions representing varying concentrations of the 5 basic tastes on the general Labeled Magnitude Scale. No difference in intensity ratings was evident between the control and sound condition for salty, sour, or bitter tastes. Likewise, panelists did not perform differently during sound conditions when rating tactile, visual, or auditory stimulation, or in reaction time tests. Interestingly, sweet taste intensity was rated progressively lower, whereas the perception of umami taste was augmented during the experimental sound condition, to a progressively greater degree with increasing concentration. We postulate that this effect arises from mechanostimulation of the chorda tympani nerve, which transits directly across the tympanic membrane of the middle ear.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/xhp0000044

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yan, K. S., & Dando, R.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Published
2015
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
590-596
ISSN
  • 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1277
OpenAlex
W2105715496
Cited by
97
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5
FWCI
12.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Cornell University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
cross-modal perception, taste perception, auditions, multisensory integration, umami taste, sweet taste, taste intensity, chorda tympani nerve, mechanical stimulation, basic taste
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adolescent, Adult, Auditory Perception, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Taste Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review