Cited by 184Multisensory perception and integrationTactile and Sensory InteractionsNeuroscience and Music Perception

As bitter as a trombone: Synesthetic correspondences in nonsynesthetes between tastes/flavors and musical notes

Open access
Crisinel, A.-S., Spence, C.·2010·Attention, Perception & Psychophysics

Abstract

In parallel to studies of various cases of synesthesia, many cross-modal correspondences have also been documented in nonsynesthetes. Among these correspondences, implicit associations between taste and pitch have been reported recently (Crisinel & Spence, 2009, 2010). Here, we replicate and extend these findings through explicit matching of sounds of varying pitch to a range of tastes/flavors. In addition, participants in the experiment reported here also chose the type of musical instrument most appropriate for each taste/flavor. The association of sweet and sour tastes to high-pitched notes was confirmed. By contrast, umami and bitter tastes were preferentially matched to low-pitched notes. Flavors did not display such strong pitch associations. The choice of musical instrument seems to have been driven primarily by a matching of the hedonic value and familiarity of the two types of stimuli. Our results raise important questions about our representation of tastes and flavors and could also lead to applications in the marketing of food products.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/app.72.7.1994

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Specific auditory attributes are associated with basic tastes, both when presented as taste words and in the form of tasting solutions.

    “Previously, it has been shown that specific auditory attributes are associated with basic tastes, both when presented as taste words (for instance, 'sweet'), and in the form of tasting solutions [80-88]”

    From The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Sensory Factors in Sweetness Perception of Food and Beverages: A Review (2019) · cites this paper as [82]

    The Stimuli section (page unavailable) describes basic tastes presented as solutions, and Ratings of Sounds reports associations with pitch. The paper also reports earlier findings using names of food or drink items, but not basic-taste words such as “sweet”; that specific presentation format is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Spence, C., Shankar, M. U., & Blumenthal, H. (2010). "Sound bites": Auditory contributions to the perception and consumption of food and drink. In F. Bacci & D. Mecher (Eds.), Art and the senses (pp. 207-238). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crisinel, A.-S., & Spence, C.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Crisinel, A.-S.
Venue
Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
Published
2010-10-01
Volume
72
Issue
7
Pages
1994-2002
ISSN
  • 1943-3921 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-393X
OpenAlex
W2006443947
Cited by
184
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
13.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
cross-modal correspondence, synesthesia, flavor, musical pitch, umami, bitter taste, hedonic value, familiarity, food marketing
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Association, Choice Behavior, Discrimination, Psychological, Female, Flavoring Agents, Humans, Male, Music, Pitch Perception, Taste, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review