Cited by 174Multisensory perception and integrationTactile and Sensory InteractionsCategorization, perception, and language

What sound does that taste? Cross-modal mappings across gustation and audition

Open access
Simner, Julia, Cuskley, Christine, Kirby, Simon·2010·Perception

Abstract

All people share implicit mappings across the senses, which give us preferences for certain sensory combinations over others (eg light colours are preferentially paired with higher-pitch sounds; Ward et al, 2006 Cortex 42 264-280). Although previous work has tended to focus on the cross-modality of vision with other senses, here we present evidence of systematic cross-modality between taste and sound. We created four sound continua representing to varying extents phonetic qualities of speech (F1, F2, voice discontinuity, and spectral balance). Sixty-five participants selected their preferred sound to accompany each of the basic tastes of sweet, sour, bitter, and salty, at two different concentrations. We found significant shared preferences among our participants to map certain acoustic qualities to certain types of tastes (eg sweet tastes tend to be mapped to a lower spectral balance than sour tastes). We also found a preference for mapping certain sound qualities to different taste concentrations. Together our data provide the first detailed analysis of how phonetic features map systematically to different tastants and concentrations. We examine the roots of these mappings, and discuss how such associations might guide the ways in which human languages are used to name objects with taste.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1068/p6591

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Specific auditory attributes are associated with basic tastes, both when presented as taste words and in the form of tasting solutions.

    “Previously, it has been shown that specific auditory attributes are associated with basic tastes, both when presented as taste words (for instance, 'sweet'), and in the form of tasting solutions [80-88]”

    From The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Sensory Factors in Sweetness Perception of Food and Beverages: A Review (2019) · cites this paper as [88]

    The Methods (p. 5) and Discussion (p. 11) show that participants matched sweet, salty, bitter, and sour solutions to auditory qualities. The Discussion (p. 12) also reports an earlier study using food names to represent tastes, but this paper did not test basic-taste words such as ‘sweet’; that part of the claim is not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Cuskley C, Simner J, Kirby S, 2009 ''Cross-modality bootstrapping protolanguage: reconsidering the evidence'', poster presented at the European Human Behaviour and Evolution Conference, St Andrews, Scotland, UK, 6 ^ 9 April 2009
  2. Diffloth G, 1994 ''i: big, a: small'' , in Sound Symbolism Eds L Hinton, J Nichols, J J Ohala (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp 107 ^ 114
  3. Giegerich H, 2005 English Phonology: An Introduction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
  4. Kohler W, 1947 Gestalt Psychology 2nd edition (New York: Liveright)
  5. Ladefoged P, 1993 A Course in Phonetics 3rd edition (New York: HBJ)
  6. Pape D, Mooshammer C, 2008 ''Intrinsic pitch is not a universal phenomenon: Evidence from Romance languages'', in Proceedings of the 11th Labphon (Laboratory Phonology) University of Wellington, New Zealand, available at http://phonetics.danielpape.info/paper/pape lap.pdf (retrieved 25 September 2009)
  7. Pfitzinger H R, 2003 ''Acoustic correlates of the IPA vowel diagram'' Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Science 2 1441 ^ 1444
  8. Simner J, Ludwig V, 2009 ''What colour does that feel? Cross-modal correspondences from touch to colour'', paper presented at Third International Conference of Synaesthesia and Art, 26 ^ 29 April 2009 (Artecitta), Granada, Spain

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simner, J., Cuskley, C., & Kirby, S.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Simner, Julia
Venue
Perception
Published
2010-01-01
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
553-569
ISSN
  • 0301-0066 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4233
OpenAlex
W2133507640
Cited by
174
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
FWCI
10.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perception (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
Keywords
cross-modal correspondence, taste perception, auditions, basic taste, fundamental frequency, spectral balance, multisensory integration
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adolescent, Adult, Association, Brain Mapping, Food, Humans, Models, Biological, Nervous System Physiological Phenomena, Pitch Discrimination, Sound, Statistics as Topic, Taste, Taste Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review