Cited by 1,364Insect Pheromone Research and ControlOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research

‘Pheromones’: a New Term for a Class of Biologically Active Substances

KARLSON, P., LÜSCHER, M.·1959·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/183055a0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The term pheromone was coined to describe a chemical substance which carries a message about the physiological or behavioral state of an insect to members of its own species, resulting in a specific reaction.

    “The term pheromone was coined to describe a chemical substance which carries a message about the physiological or behavioral state of an insect to members of its own species, resulting in 'a specific reaction, for example a definite behaviour or a developmental process' (Karlson and Luscher, 1959).”

    From Human Vomeronasal Organ Function: A Critical Review of Best and Worst Cases (2001) · cites this paper as Karlson and Luscher, 1959

  • It can be argued that there is no need for a special term for mutually beneficial chemical communication, but some distinction between communication and a casual use of chemosensory information does seem a useful distinction.

    “It can be argued (Beauchamp et al., 1976) that there is no need for a special term for mutually beneficial chemical communication, but, as emphasized by Karlson and Luscher (Karlson and Luscher, 1959), some distinction between communication and a casual use of chemosensory information does seem a useful distinction.”

    From Human Vomeronasal Organ Function: A Critical Review of Best and Worst Cases (2001) · cites this paper as Karlson and Luscher, 1959

  • It is clear in the original description, and in a later more extensive review of examples, that pheromone communication was to be real communication, beneficial to the sender and, by implication, to the receiver.

    “It is clear in the original description, and in a later more extensive review of examples (Karlson and Butenandt, 1959), that this was to be real communication, beneficial to the sender and, by implication, to the receiver.”

    From Human Vomeronasal Organ Function: A Critical Review of Best and Worst Cases (2001) · cites this paper as Karlson and Luscher, 1959

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KARLSON, P., & LÜSCHER, M.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • University of Bern (CH)
Venue
Nature
Published
1959-01
Volume
183
Issue
4653
Pages
55-56
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2012771681
Cited by
1,364
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 58
FWCI
22.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Pheromone Research and Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Keywords
pheromones, chemical communication, insect glands, interspecies communication, mating behavior
MeSH terms
Hormones, Humans, Pheromones

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review