Cited by 541Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationMarine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyInvertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology

Hox genes in brachiopods and priapulids and protostome evolution

de Rosa, Renaud, Grenier, Jennifer K., Andreeva, Tatiana, Cook, Charles E., Adoutte, André, Akam, Michael, Carroll, Sean B., Balavoine, Guillaume·1999·Nature

Abstract

Understanding the early evolution of animal body plans requires knowledge both of metazoan phylogeny and of the genetic and developmental changes involved in the emergence of particular forms. Recent 18S ribosomal RNA phylogenies suggest a three-branched tree for the Bilateria comprising the deuterostomes and two great protostome clades, the lophotrochozoans and ecdysozoans. Here, we show that the complement of Hox genes in critical protostome phyla reflects these phylogenetic relationships and reveals the early evolution of developmental regulatory potential in bilaterians. We have identified Hox genes that are shared by subsets of protostome phyla. These include a diverged pair of posterior (Abdominal-B-like) genes in both a brachiopod and a polychaete annelid, which supports the lophotrochozoan assemblage, and a distinct posterior Hox gene shared by a priapulid, a nematode and the arthropods, which supports the ecdysozoan clade. The ancestors of each of these two major protostome lineages had a minimum of eight to ten Hox genes. The major period of Hox gene expansion and diversification thus occurred before the radiation of each of the three great bilaterian clades.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/21631

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A Hox complex of at least seven genes appears to be a bilaterian invention.

    “Hence, a Hox complex consisting of at least seven genes (de Rosa et al., 1999) appears to be a bilaterian invention.”

    From Bilaterian Origins: Significance of New Experimental Observations (2000) · cites this paper as de Rosa et al., 1999

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Rosa, R., Grenier, J. K., Andreeva, T., Cook, C. E., Adoutte, A., Akam, M., Carroll, S. B., & Balavoine, G.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • St Petersburg University (RU)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
Corresponding author
Balavoine, Guillaume
Venue
Nature
Published
1999-06
Volume
399
Issue
6738
Pages
772-776
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1582956895
Cited by
541
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 11
FWCI
18.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
Keywords
Hox genes, brachiopods, priapulids, lophotrochozoans, ecdysozoans, deuterostomes, body plan evolution, 18S rRNA phylogeny, Polychaeta, nematodes, arthropods, developmental regulatory genes
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Biological Evolution, Genes, Homeobox, Invertebrates, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny, Sequence Alignment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review