Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 644

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improved auditory spatial tuning in blind humans

Röder, Brigitte, Teder-Sälejärvi, Wolfgang, Sterr, Anette, Rösler, Frank, Hillyard, Steven A., Neville, Helen J.·1999·Nature
DOI 10.1038/22106
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/22106

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Muchnik, C., Efrati, M., Nemeth, E., Malin, M. & Hildesheimer, M. Central auditory skills in blind and sighted subjects. Scand. Audiol. 20, 19–23 (1991). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Lessard, N., Pareé, Lepore, F. & Lassonde, M. Early-blind human subjects localize sound sources better than sighted subjects. Nature 395, 278–280 (1998). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Rice, C. E. Early experience and perceptual enhancement. Res. Bull. Am. Found. Blind 22, 1–22 (1970).
  4. Miller, L. Diderot reconsidered: Visual impairment and auditory compensation. J. Vis. Impair. Blind. 86, 206–210 (1992). · DOI
  5. Röder, B., Rösler, F. & Hennighausen, E. Different cortical activation patterns in blind and sighted humans during encoding and transformation of haptic images. Psychophysiology 34, 292–307 (1997). · DOI
  6. Röder, B., Rösler, F., Hennighausen, E. & Näcker, F. Event-related potentials during auditory and somatosensory discrimination in sighted and blind human subjects. Cogn. Brain Res. 4, 77–93 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Rösler, F., Röder, B., Heil, M. & Hennighausen, E. Topographic differences of slow event-related brain potentials in blind and sighted adult human subjects during haptic mental rotation. Cogn. Brain Res. 1, 145–159 (1993). · DOI
  8. Wanet-Defalque, M. C. et al. High metabolic activity in the visual cortex of early blind human subjects. Brain Res. 446, 369–373 (1988). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Uhl, F., Franzen, P., Podreka, I., Steiner, M. & Deecke, L. Increased regional cerebral blood flow in inferior occipital cortex and cerebellum of early blind humans. Neurosci. Lett. 150, 162–164 (1993). · DOI
  10. Kujala, T., Alho, K., Paavilainen, P., Summala, H. & Näätänen, R. Neuronal plasticity in processing of sound location by the early blind: an event-related potential study. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 84, 469–472 (1992). · DOI
  11. Neville, H. J. & Lawson, D. Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an event-related potential and behavioral study. II. Congenitally deaf adults. Brain Res. 405, 268–283 (1987). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Neville, H. J., Schmidt, A. & Kutas, M. Alterated visual-evoked potentials in congenitally deaf adults. Brain Res. 266, 127–132 (1983). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Downing, C. J. & Pinker, S. in Attention and Performance Vol. XI(eds Posner, M. & Martin, O. S. M.) 171–188 (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, (1985).
  14. Mondor, T. A. & Zatorre, R. J. Shifting and focusing auditory spatial attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. 211, 387–409 (1995). · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.2.387 · Paper page
  15. Hillyard, S. A., Mangun, G. R., Woldorff, M. C. & Luck, S. J. in The Cognitive Neurosciences (ed. Gazzaniga, M. S.) 665–681 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, (1995).
  16. Teder-Sälejärvi, W. & Hillyard, S. A. The gradient of spatial auditory attention in free field: An event-related potential study. Percept. Psychophys. 60, 1228–1242 (1998). · DOI
  17. Middlebrooks, J. C. & Green, D. M. Sound localization by human listeners. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 42, 135–159 (1991). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Ashmead, D. H. et al. Spatial hearing in blind children with visual disabilities. Perception 27, 105–122 (1998). · DOI
  19. Rauschecker, J. P. & Harris, L. R. Auditory compensation of the effect of visual deprivation in cats' superior colliculus. Exp. Brain Res. 50, 63–83 (1983). · DOI
  20. Hyvärinen, J., Hyvärinen, L. & Linnankoski, I. Modification of parietal association cortex and functional blindness after binocular deprivation in young monkeys. Exp. Brain Res. 42, 1–8 (1981). · DOI
  21. Cohen, L. G. et al. Functional relevance of cross-model plasticity in blind humans. Nature 389, 180–183 (1997). · DOI · Paper page
  22. Knudsen, E. I. Capacity for plasticity in the adult owl auditory system expanded by juvenile experience. Science 279, 1531–1533 (1998). · DOI · Paper page
  23. Clark, V. P., Fan, S. & Hillyard, S. A. Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses. Hum. Brain. Map. 2, 170–187 (1995). · DOI · Paper page
  24. Huynh, H. & Feldt, L. S. Estimation of the box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in randomized block and splitplot designs. J. Edu. Stat. 1, 69–82 (1976). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 644

Metadata

Authors
Röder, B., Teder-Sälejärvi, W., Sterr, A., Rösler, F., Hillyard, S. A., & Neville, H. J.
Venue
Nature
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1999-07
Volume
400
Issue
6740
Pages
162-166
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
DOI
10.1038/22106
OpenAlex
W1671007513
Cited by
644
References
3
FWCI
9.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved auditory spatial tuning in blind humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/22106
The paper
Röder, B., Teder-Sälejärvi, W., Sterr, A., Rösler, F., Hillyard, S. A., & Neville, H. J. (1999). Improved auditory spatial tuning in blind humans. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/22106

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.