Cited by 199Ion channel regulation and functionAnesthesia and Sedative AgentsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Volatile general anaesthetics activate a novel neuronal K+ current

Franks, N. P., Lieb, W. R.·1988·Nature

Abstract

Although it is still controversial whether the primary target sites underlying general anaesthesia are proteins or lipids, it is generally thought that the ultimate targets are ion channels in nerve membranes. One approach to finding these targets is to study the effects of general anaesthetics on identified neurons, where differential effects on neuronal activity can be pursued to the molecular level. Here we report that amongst a group of apparently identical molluscan neurons having endogenous firing activity, a single cell displays an unusual sensitivity to volatile agents (which, at surgical levels, completely inhibit its activity). We further show that this sensitivity is due to a novel anaesthetic-activated K+ current, which is found in the sensitive cell but not in the surrounding insensitive cells. This K+ conductance is not appreciably voltage-gated and persists for as long as the anaesthetic is present. The response to anaesthetics is completely reversible and saturates at low anaesthetic partial pressures: the half-maximal response for halothane occurs at 0.0063 atm, close to its minimum alveolar concentration (0.0075 atm) in man.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/333662a0

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Volatile anesthetics can potentiate hyperpolarizing potassium currents in Lymnaea stagnalis.

    “Studies conducted in the freshwater snail, Lymnaea stagnalis, were amongst the first to document that volatile anesthetics could potentiate hyperpolarizing potassium currents flowing out of the cell [47].”

    From The Biology of General Anesthesia from Paramecium to Primate (2019) · cites this paper as [47]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Franks, N. P., & Lieb, W. R.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Venue
Nature
Published
1988-06
Volume
333
Issue
6174
Pages
662-664
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2002422188
Cited by
199
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
volatile anesthetics, general anesthesia, potassium currents, ion channels, halothane, molluscan neurons, minimum alveolar concentration
MeSH terms
Animals, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Halothane, Ion Channels, Kinetics, Lymnaea, Membrane Potentials, Neurons, Potassium, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review