Cited by 150Sleep and related disordersCircadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Wakefulness Research

The human sleep project

Roenneberg, Till·2013·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/498427a

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roenneberg, T.
Affiliations
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Roenneberg, Till
Venue
Nature
Published
2013-06-26
Volume
498
Issue
7455
Pages
427-428
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2077234262
Cited by
150
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
16.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
sleep, sleep research, demographic data collection
MeSH terms
Animals, Environment, Germany, Health Surveys, Humans, Public Health, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Jet Lag Syndrome, Models, Animal, Biomedical Research, Circadian Clocks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review