Cited by 118Ethics and Social Impacts of AIPolicing Practices and PerceptionsArtificial Intelligence in Law

Reform predictive policing

Open access
Shapiro, Aaron·2017·Nature

Abstract

Police agencies, software firms and the public must ensure that crime-forecasting software improves public safety and officer accountability, writes Aaron Shapiro.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/541458a

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The technology's reliance on lists to identify suspects or to target patrols, combined with the lower accuracy of algorithms when analysing the faces of people of colour, is likely to reinforce over-policing of black and minority ethnic groups.

    “The technology's reliance on such lists to identify suspects or to target patrols 8 , combined with the lower accuracy of algorithms when analysing the faces of people of colour, is likely to reinforce over-policing of black and minority ethnic groups.”

    From Rethink government with AI (2019) · cites this paper as [8]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Robinson, D. & Koepke, L. Stuck in a Pattern: Early Evidence on "Predictive Policing" and Civil Rights (Upturn, 2016); available at http://go.nature. com/2it4tnr
  2. Brayne, S., Rosenblat, A. & Boyd, D. in Data & Civil Rights: A New Era of Policing and Justice (2015); available at http://go.nature.com/2j6cot5
  3. Manning, P. in Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice (eds Bruinsma, G. & Weisburd, D.) 2501-2513 (Springer, 2014).
  4. Gutierrez, C. M. & Kirk, D. S. Crime Delinquency http://doi.org/bw9k (2015).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shapiro, A.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Shapiro, Aaron
Venue
Nature
Published
2017-01-26
Volume
541
Issue
7638
Pages
458-460
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2578180596
Cited by
118
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
FWCI
25.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Artificial Intelligence in Law
Keywords
predictive policing, algorithmic bias, police accountability, public safety, algorithmic transparency, police technology
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Crime, Criminology, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Forecasting, Humans, Safety, Software, United States, Police, Law Enforcement, Criminals, Spatio-Temporal Analysis, Geographic Mapping, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review