The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reduction of tumour oxygenation during and after photodynamic therapy in vivo: effects of fluence rate
Open accessAbstract
It has been proposed that the generation of O2 during photodynamic therapy (PDT) may lead to photochemical depletion of ambient tumour oxygen, thus causing acute hypoxia and limiting treatment effectiveness. We have studied the effects of fluence rate on pO2, in the murine RIF tumour during and after PDT using 5 mg kg(-1) Photofrin and fluence rates of 30, 75 or 150 mW cm(-2). Median pO2 before PDT ranged from 2.9 to 5.2 mmHg in three treatment groups. Within the first minute of illumination, median tumour pO2 decreased with all fluence rates to values between 0.7 and 1.1 mmHg. These effects were rapidly and completely reversible if illumination was interrupted. During prolonged illumination (20-50 J cm(-2)) pO2 recovered at the 30 mW cm(-2) fluence rate to a median value of 7.4 mmHg, but remained low at the 150 mW cm(-2) fluence rate (median pO2 1.7 mmHg). Fluence rate effects were not found after PDT, and at both 30 and 150 mW cm(-2) median tumour pO2 fell from control levels to 1.0-1.8 mmHg within 1-3 h after treatment conclusion. PDT with 100 J cm(-2) at 30 mW cm(-2) caused significantly (P = 0.0004) longer median tumour regrowth times than PDT at 150 mW cm(-2), indicating that lower fluence rate can improve PDT response. Vascular perfusion studies uncovered significant fluence rate-dependent differences in the responses of the normal and tumour vasculature. These data establish a direct relationship between tumour pO2, the fluence rate applied during PDT and treatment outcome. The findings are of immediate clinical relevance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration.
Mantel, N. (1966) · PubMed · Cited by 7,519
(1989) · PubMed · Cited by 3,343
HOW DOES PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY WORK?
Henderson, B. W., & Dougherty, T. J. (1992) · Photochemistry and Photobiology · doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.1992.tb04222.x · Cited by 2,358
Self-citationVaupel, P. W., Schlenger, K., Knoop, C., & Höckel, M. (1991) · PubMed · Cited by 952
Oxygen Consumption and Diffusion Effects in Photodynamic Therapy
Foster, T. H., Murant, R. S., Bryant, R. G., Knox, R. S., Gibson, S. L., & Hilf, R. (1991) · Radiation Research · doi:10.2307/3577919 · Cited by 400
Relationship of tumor hypoxia and response to photodynamic treatment in an experimental mouse tumor.
Henderson, B. W., & Fingar, V. H. (1987) · PubMed · Cited by 342
Self-citationStone, H. B., Brown, J. M., Phillips, T. L., & Sutherland, R. M. (1993) · Radiation Research · doi:10.2307/3578556 · Cited by 303
Fingar, V. H., Wieman, T. J., Wiehle, S., & Cerrito, P. B. (1992) · PubMed · Cited by 289
The Mechanism of Photofrin Photobleaching and Its Consequences for Photodynamic Dosimetry
Georgakoudi, I., Nichols, M. G., & Foster, T. H. (1997) · Photochemistry and Photobiology · doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.1997.tb01889.x · Cited by 228
Oxygen dependence of the photosensitizing effect of hematoporphyrin derivative in NHIK 3025 cells.
Moan, J. E., & Sommer, S. (1985) · PubMed · Cited by 225
Cited by
Dougherty, T. J., Gomer, C. J., Henderson, B. W., Jori, G., Kessel, D., Korbelik, M., Moan, J., & Peng, Q. (1998) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/90.12.889 · Cited by 4,716
Self-citationImaging and Photodynamic Therapy: Mechanisms, Monitoring, and Optimization
Celli, J. P., Spring, B. Q., Rizvi, I., Evans, C. L., Samkoe, K. S., Verma, S., Pogue, B. W., & Hasan, T. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900300p · Cited by 2,324
Cheng, Y., Cheng, H., Jiang, C., Qiu, X., Wang, K., Huan, W., Yuan, A., Wu, J., & Hu, Y. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms9785 · Cited by 941
Wang, S., Huang, P., Nie, L., Xing, R., Liu, D., Wang, Z., Lin, J., Chen, S., Niu, G., Lu, G., et al. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201204623 · Cited by 503
Light Sources and Dosimetry Techniques for Photodynamic Therapy
Kim, M. M., & Darafsheh, A. (2020) · Photochemistry and Photobiology · doi:10.1111/php.13219 · Cited by 454
Metadata
- Authors
- Sitnik, T., Hampton, J., & Henderson, B.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1386-1394
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W2018987388
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 9.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reduction of tumour oxygenation during and after photodynamic therapy in vivo: effects of fluence rate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/bjc.1998.231
- The paper
- Sitnik, T., Hampton, J., & Henderson, B. (1998). Reduction of tumour oxygenation during and after photodynamic therapy in vivo: effects of fluence rate. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1998.231
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.