Cited by 121Anesthesia and Pain ManagementPediatric Pain Management TechniquesPain Management and Opioid Use

Chronic preoperative pain and psychological robustness predict acute postoperative pain outcomes after surgery for breast cancer

Open access
on behalf of the Recovery Study Group, Bruce, J, Thornton, A J, Scott, N W, Marfizo, S, Powell, R, Johnston, M, Wells, M +2 more·2012·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few epidemiological studies have prospectively investigated preoperative and surgical risk factors for acute postoperative pain after surgery for breast cancer. We investigated demographic, psychological, pain-related and surgical risk factors in women undergoing resectional surgery for breast cancer. METHODS: Primary outcomes were pain severity, at rest (PAR) and movement-evoked pain (MEP), in the first postoperative week. RESULTS: In 338 women undergoing surgery, those with chronic preoperative pain were three times more likely to report moderate to severe MEP after breast cancer surgery (OR 3.18, 95% CI 1.45-6.99). Increased psychological 'robustness', a composite variable representing positive affect and dispositional optimism, was associated with lower intensity acute postoperative PAR (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.48-0.82) and MEP (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.54-0.93). Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and intraoperative nerve division were associated with reduced postoperative pain. No relationship was found between preoperative neuropathic pain and acute pain outcomes; altered sensations and numbness postoperatively were more common after axillary sample or clearance compared with SLNB. CONCLUSION: Chronic preoperative pain, axillary surgery and psychological robustness significantly predicted acute pain outcomes after surgery for breast cancer. Preoperative identification and targeted intervention of subgroups at risk could enhance the recovery trajectory in cancer survivors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/bjc.2012.341

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
on behalf of the Recovery Study Group, Bruce, J., Thornton, A. J., Scott, N. W., Marfizo, S., Powell, R., Johnston, M., Wells, M., Heys, S. D., & Thompson, A. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • Aston University (GB)
  • Ninewells Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Bruce, J
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2012-07-31
Volume
107
Issue
6
Pages
937-946
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W1971289412
Cited by
121
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Cancer Research UK (C23143/A7531)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
breast cancer surgery, acute postoperative pain, dispositional optimism, positive affect, movement-evoked pain, sentinel lymph node biopsy, axillary surgery, nerve division, postoperative numbness, cancer survivorship
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Mastectomy, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Pain, Postoperative, Postoperative Pain, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Temperament, Incidence, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, Preoperative Period, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review