Cited by 256Bone Metabolism and DiseasesBone fractures and treatmentsWound Healing and Treatments

Unraveling macrophage contributions to bone repair

Open access
Wu, Andy C, Raggatt, Liza J, Alexander, Kylie A, Pettit, Allison R·2013·BoneKEy Reports

Abstract

Macrophages have reemerged to prominence with widened understanding of their pleiotropic contributions to many biologies and pathologies. This includes clear advances in revealing their importance in wound healing. Here we have focused on the current state of knowledge with respect to bone repair, which has received relatively little scientific attention compared with its soft-tissue counterparts. Our detailed characterization of resident tissue macrophages residing in bone-lining tissues (osteomacs), including their pro-anabolic function, exposed a more prominent role for these cells in bone biology than previously anticipated. Recent studies have confirmed the importance of macrophages in early inflammatory processes that establish the healing cascade after bone fracture. Emerging data support that macrophage influence extends into both anabolic and catabolic phases of repair, suggesting that these cells have prolonged and diverse functions during fracture healing. More research is needed to clarify macrophage phase-specific contributions, temporospatial subpopulation variance and macrophage specific-molecular mediators. There is also clear motivation for determining whether macrophage alterations underlie compromised fracture healing. Overall, there is strong justification to pursue strategies targeting macrophages and/or their products for improving normal bone healing and overcoming failed repair.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/bonekey.2013.107

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, A. C., Raggatt, L. J., Alexander, K. A., & Pettit, A. R.
Affiliations
  • Translational Research Institute (AU)
  • QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
Venue
BoneKEy Reports
Publisher
Portico
Published
2013-06-26
Volume
2
Pages
373-373
ISSN
2047-6396 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001094576
Cited by
256
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BoneKEy Reports (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Bone fractures and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
Keywords
macrophages, bone regeneration, fracture healing, bone formation, bone catabolism, bone inflammation, macrophage heterogeneity, macrophage-targeted therapy, impaired fracture healing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review