Cited by 877Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsChromatin Remodeling and CancerEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Distinct roles of GCN5/PCAF‐mediated H3K9ac and CBP/p300‐mediated H3K18/27ac in nuclear receptor transactivation

Open access
Jin, Qihuang, Yu, Li‐Rong, Wang, Lifeng, Zhang, Zhijing, Kasper, Lawryn H, Lee, Ji‐Eun, Wang, Chaochen, Brindle, Paul K +2 more·2011·The EMBO Journal

Abstract

Histone acetyltransferases (HATs) GCN5 and PCAF (GCN5/PCAF) and CBP and p300 (CBP/p300) are transcription co-activators. However, how these two distinct families of HATs regulate gene activation remains unclear. Here, we show deletion of GCN5/PCAF in cells specifically and dramatically reduces acetylation on histone H3K9 (H3K9ac) while deletion of CBP/p300 specifically and dramatically reduces acetylations on H3K18 and H3K27 (H3K18/27ac). A ligand for nuclear receptor (NR) PPARδ induces sequential enrichment of H3K18/27ac, RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and H3K9ac on PPARδ target gene Angptl4 promoter, which correlates with a robust Angptl4 expression. Inhibiting transcription elongation blocks ligand-induced H3K9ac, but not H3K18/27ac, on the Angptl4 promoter. Finally, we show GCN5/PCAF and GCN5/PCAF-mediated H3K9ac correlate with, but are surprisingly dispensable for, NR target gene activation. In contrast, CBP/p300 and their HAT activities are essential for ligand-induced Pol II recruitment on, and activation of, NR target genes. These results highlight the substrate and site specificities of HATs in cells, demonstrate the distinct roles of GCN5/PCAF- and CBP/p300-mediated histone acetylations in gene activation, and suggest an important role of CBP/p300-mediated H3K18/27ac in NR-dependent transcription.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/emboj.2010.318

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SWI/SNF recruits the chromatin activators P300 and CBP, which mediate acetylation of histone H3 lysine 27 through their intrinsic histone acetyltransferase activity.

    “SWI/SNF recruits the chromatin activators P300 and CBP, which mediate the acetylation of histone H3 lysine 27 through their intrinsic histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity [59–62].”

    From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [60]

    The Introduction identifies CBP and p300 as histone acetyltransferase co-activators, and “Substrate and site specificities of CBP/p300” reports that they are required for over 90% of H3K27 acetylation in mouse embryonic fibroblasts. The cited paper does not establish the sentence’s additional claim that SWI/SNF recruits CBP and p300. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jin, Q., Yu, L., Wang, L., Zhang, Z., Kasper, L. H., Lee, J., Wang, C., Brindle, P. K., Dent, S. Y. R., & Ge, K.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • National Center for Toxicological Research (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Ge, Kai
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Published
2010-12-03
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
249-262
ISSN
  • 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2075
OpenAlex
W2158074192
Cited by
877
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 33
FWCI
12.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99 DK999999)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM067718)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (Z01DK075003, ZIADK047055, ZIADK075017, ZIADK075003)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (DE018183, R21DE018183)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
histone acetyltransferase, CBP/p300, H3K9 acetylation, nuclear receptor transactivation, PPARδ, ANGPTL4, RNA polymerase II recruitment, transcription elongation, gene activation
MeSH terms
Angiopoietin-Like Protein 4, p300-CBP-Associated Factor, Acetylation, Animals, Histones, Humans, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Mass Spectrometry, Substrate Specificity, Thiazoles, Blotting, Western, Transcriptional Activation, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Angiopoietins, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, PPAR delta, p300-CBP Transcription Factors, E1A-Associated p300 Protein, Mice, Gene Knockout Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review