Cited by 149Obesity and Health PracticesObesity, Physical Activity, DietEating Disorders and Behaviors

Weight stigma experienced by patients with obesity in healthcare settings: A qualitative evidence synthesis

Open access
Ryan, Leona, Coyne, Rory, Heary, Caroline, Birney, Susie, Crotty, Michael, Dunne, Rosie, Conlan, Owen, Walsh, Jane C.·2023·Obesity Reviews

Abstract

Summary: Weight stigma research is largely focused on quantifiable outcomes with inadequate representation of the perspectives of those that are affected by it. This study offers a comprehensive systematic review and synthesis of weight stigma experienced in healthcare settings, from the perspective of patients living with obesity. A total of 1340 studies was screened, of which 32 were included in the final synthesis. Thematic synthesis generated three overarching analytical themes: (1) verbal and non‐verbal communication of stigma, (2) weight stigma impacts the provision of care, and (3) weight stigma and systemic barriers to healthcare. The first theme relates to the communication of weight stigma perceived by patients within patient–provider interactions. The second theme describes the patients' perceptions of how weight stigma impacts upon care provision. The third theme highlighted the perceived systemic barriers faced by patients when negotiating the healthcare system. Patient suggestions to reduce weight stigma in healthcare settings are also presented. Weight stigma experienced within interpersonal interactions migrates to the provision of care, mediates gaining equitable access to services, and perpetuates a poor systemic infrastructure to support the needs of patients with obesity. A non‐collaborative approach to practice and treatment renders patients feeling they have no control over their own healthcare requirements.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/obr.13606

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Parker G. Shamed in to health? Fat women's views on obesity manage- ment strategies in maternity care. Women's Stud J. 2017;31(1):22-33.
  2. Bąk-Sosnowska M, Moszak M, Doroszewska A, Wyleżoł M, Ostrowska L, Bogda nski P. Patient-centered care and "people-first language" as tools to prevent stigmatization of patients with obesity. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2022;132(10):16351.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ryan, L., Coyne, R., Heary, C., Birney, S., Crotty, M., Dunne, R., Conlan, O., & Walsh, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
  • Irish Coalition for People Living with Obesity (ICPO) Dublin Ireland
  • Best Weight Clinic Dublin Ireland
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Ryan, Leona
Venue
Obesity Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-08-02
Volume
24
Issue
10
Pages
e13606-e13606
ISSN
  • 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-789X
OpenAlex
W4385514521
Cited by
149
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 4
FWCI
7.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Irish Research eLibrary
  • Science Foundation Ireland (18/CRT/6224)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
weight stigma, obesity, healthcare settings, patient-provider communication, verbal and nonverbal communication, quality of care, systemic barriers, health care access, health equity, patient experience, stigma reduction
MeSH terms
Weight Prejudice, Attitude of Health Personnel, Humans, Obesity, Qualitative Research, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review