Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 222

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Positron Emission Tomographic Measurement of Cerebral Blood Flow and Permeability—Surface Area Product of Water Using [15O]Water and [11C]Butanol

Herscovitch, Peter, Raichle, Marcus E., Kilbourn, Michael R., Welch, Michael J.·1987·Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism

Abstract

We have previously adapted Kety's tissue autoradiographic method for measuring regional CBF in laboratory animals to the measurement of CBF in humans with positron emission tomography (PET) and H 215 O. Because this model assumes diffusion equilibrium between tissue and venous blood, the use of a diffusion-limited tracer, such as H 215 O, may lead to an underestimation of CBF. We therefore validated the use of [11 C]butanol as an alternative freely diffusible tracer for PET. We then used it in humans to determine the underestimation of CBF that occurs with H 215 O, and thereby were able to calculate the extraction E w and permeability–surface area product PS w of H 215 O. Measurements of the permeability of rhesus monkey brain to [11 C]butanol, obtained by means of an intracarotid injection, external detection technique, demonstrated that this tracer is freely diffusible up to a CBF of at least 170 ml/min-100 g. CBF measured in baboons with the PET autoradiographic method and [11 C]butanol was then compared with CBF measured in the same animals with a standard residue detection method. An excellent correspondence was obtained between both of these measurements. Finally, paired PET measurements of CBF were made with both H 215 O and [11 C]butanol in 17 normal human subjects. Average global CBF was significantly greater when measured with [11 C]butanol (53.1 ml/min-100 g) than with H 215 O (44.4 ml/min-100 g). Average global E w was 0.84 and global PS w was 104 ml/min-100 g. Regional measurements showed a linear relationship between local PS w and CBF, while E w was relatively uniform throughout the brain. Simulations were used to determine the potential error associated with the use of an incorrect value for the brain–blood partition coefficient for [11 C]butanol and to calculate the effect of tissue heterogeneity and errors in flow measurement on the calculation of PS w.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/jcbfm.1987.102

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 222

Metadata

Authors
Herscovitch, P., Raichle, M. E., Kilbourn, M. R., & Welch, M. J.
Venue
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
Published
1987-10
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
527-542
ISSN
  • 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-7016
OpenAlex
W2056316680
Cited by
222
References
1
FWCI
7.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Positron Emission Tomographic Measurement of Cerebral Blood Flow and Permeability—Surface Area Product of Water Using [15O]Water and [11C]Butanol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/jcbfm.1987.102
The paper
Herscovitch, P., Raichle, M. E., Kilbourn, M. R., & Welch, M. J. (1987). Positron Emission Tomographic Measurement of Cerebral Blood Flow and Permeability—Surface Area Product of Water Using [15O]Water and [11C]Butanol. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.1987.102

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.