Cited by 507Acute Kidney Injury ResearchRenal Diseases and GlomerulopathiesNephrotoxicity and Medicinal Plants

Acute interstitial nephritis

Open access
Praga, Manuel, González, Ester·2010·Kidney International

Abstract

Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) represents a frequent cause of acute kidney injury, accounting for 15-27% of renal biopsies performed because of this condition. By and large, drug-induced AIN is currently the commonest etiology of AIN, with antimicrobials and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs being the most frequent offending agents. Pathogenesis is based on an immunologic reaction against endogenous nephritogenic antigens or exogenous antigens processed by tubular cells, with cell-mediated immunity having a major pathogenic role. The characteristic interstitial infiltrates, mostly composed of lymphocytes, macrophages, eosinophils, and plasma cells, experience a rapid transformation into areas of interstitial fibrosis. A significant proportion of AIN has nowadays an oligosymptomatic presentation, although the presence of specific extrarenal symptoms such as fever, skin rash, arthralgias, and peripheral eosinophilia has an important role to orientate clinical diagnosis. Identification and removal of the offending drug are the mainstay of the treatment, but recent studies strongly suggest that early steroid administration (within 7 days after diagnosis) improves the recovery of renal function, decreasing the risk of chronic renal impairment. Delayed steroid treatment, when interstitial fibrosis has taken place, would have a less pronounced or nule therapeutic benefit.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ki.2010.89

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Direct cytopathic effects of microbial antigens or cytokine-mediated inflammation may explain renal injury in infection-associated AIN.

    “the direct cytopathic effects of microbial antigens or cytokine-mediated inflammation may be the explanation for the renal injury [14, 51]”

    From The diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis caused by infection versus antibiotic-induced interstitial nephritis: a narrative review (2024) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Definition and Etiology section says microbial antigens may elicit an immune reaction and that inflammatory infiltrates produce cytokines that amplify inflammation and promote fibrosis. It does not describe direct cytopathic effects of microbial antigens as an explanation for renal injury. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The amoxicillin-clavulanate case demonstrates an idiosyncratic immune response, with no correlation between the dose or duration of therapy.

    “This case demonstrates an idiosyncratic immune response, with no correlation between the dose or the duration of amoxicillin–clavulanate therapy [6, 14, 77].”

    From The diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis caused by infection versus antibiotic-induced interstitial nephritis: a narrative review (2024) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Definition and Etiology section describes drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis as an immune reaction with a dose-independent character, supporting the idiosyncratic-response point. The Conservative Treatment section says treatment duration has not shown a clear correlation with serum creatinine at follow-up—not that the occurrence of the reaction is unrelated to treatment duration. Neither passage addresses the specific amoxicillin–clavulanate case (page numbers unavailable in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Infection as AIN etiology requires continuation of current antibiotic therapy or even an increase in dose without immunosuppressant therapy.

    “infection as AIN etiology requires the continuation of current antibiotic therapy or even an increase in dose without the need for immunosuppressant therapy [13–15]”

    From The diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis caused by infection versus antibiotic-induced interstitial nephritis: a narrative review (2024) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Definition and Etiology section identifies infection-related AIN, but the Treatment of Other Types of AIN section gives no treatment recommendation for it. Searches for infection-related AIN treatment and antibiotic dosing found no passage advising continuation or an increased dose of antibiotics without immunosuppressant therapy. The recommendation to withdraw an offending drug concerns drug-induced AIN, a different etiology. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In patients with infection-induced AIN, steroids may increase the risk of immunosuppression, which could worsen the infection.

    “In patients with infection-induced AIN, steroids may increase the risk of immunosuppression, which could worsen the infection.”

    From The diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis caused by infection versus antibiotic-induced interstitial nephritis: a narrative review (2024) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Clinical Features section discusses AIN secondary to infectious diseases, but not steroid treatment in those patients. The Steroid Treatment and Treatment of Other Types of AIN sections discuss steroids for other forms of AIN; searches for infection-induced AIN, immunosuppression, and worsening infection found no passage addressing the claimed risk. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Praga, M., & González, E.
Affiliations
Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre (ES)
Corresponding author
Praga, Manuel
Venue
Kidney International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
77
Issue
11
Pages
956-961
ISSN
0085-2538 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091234866
Cited by
507
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 23
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Kidney International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Nephrotoxicity and Medicinal Plants
Keywords
acute interstitial nephritis, acute kidney injury, drug-induced nephrotoxicity, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antimicrobial agents, cell-mediated immunity, interstitial fibrosis, corticosteroid therapy, renal biopsy, pathogenesis
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Animals, Humans, Kidney Tubules, Nephritis, Interstitial, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Steroids, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Disease Progression, Recovery of Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review