Cited by 60Renal Diseases and GlomerulopathiesChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesLipid metabolism and disorders

Hereditary features, treatment, and prognosis of the lipoprotein glomerulopathy in patients with the APOE Kyoto mutation

Open access
Hu, Zhangxue, Huang, Songmin, Wu, Yu, Liu, Yunqiang, Liu, Xiaoxia, Su, Dan, Tao, Ye, Fu, Ping +4 more·2014·Kidney International

Abstract

Lipoprotein glomerulopathy is a rare inherited renal disease, caused by mutation of the APOE gene, characterized by proteinuria and nephrotic syndrome with elevated serum apoE. Since its treatment and outcome are unknown, we retrospectively studied 35 patients within 31 unrelated Han families with biopsy-proven lipoprotein glomerulopathy residing in the same county in southwest China. DNA sequencing detected the APOE Kyoto mutation (p. Arg25Cys) in all patients and 28 asymptomatic relatives. All shared the same ɛ3 allele. The patients presented with proteinuria, higher total triglyceride, and serum apoE levels relative to non-carriers. The serum apoE and triglyceride levels of asymptomatic carriers were between those of the patients and non-carriers. Sixteen patients received fenofibrate treatment for over 12 months. Six reached complete remission (proteinuria under 0.3 g/day with stable serum creatinine) with intensive control of their lipid profile (normalized serum apoE and triglycerides under 100 mg/dl). Eight reached partial remission. At 3 years of follow-up, patients treated with fenofibrate had superior survival and stable renal function. Thus, fenofibrate can induce lipoprotein glomerulopathy remission and the fibrate effects depend on the degree of lipid control and baseline proteinuria. Moreover, normalization of serum apoE and triglycerides can be used to judge the efficacy of lipid-lowering treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ki.2013.335

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hu, Z., Huang, S., Wu, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, X., Su, D., Tao, Y., Fu, P., Zhang, X., Peng, Z., Zhang, S., & Yang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Sichuan University (CN)
  • Kanazawa University (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Hu, Zhangxue
  • Zhang, Xiuhui
Venue
Kidney International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014
Volume
85
Issue
2
Pages
416-424
ISSN
0085-2538 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992904513
Cited by
60
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Kidney International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
Keywords
lipoprotein glomerulopathy, APOE ε3 allele, hereditary nephrotic syndrome, proteinuria, triglycerides, fenofibrate, lipid-lowering therapy, remission, prognosis, Han Chinese family, familial renal disease
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Hypolipidemic Agents, Biopsy, China, Creatinine, DNA Mutational Analysis, Female, Humans, Kidney, Kidney Diseases, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Pedigree, Phenotype, Fenofibrate, Proteinuria, Remission Induction, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Triglycerides, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome, Disease Progression, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Heredity, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Apolipoprotein E2, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review