Cited by 46Wound Healing and TreatmentsCellular Mechanics and InteractionsDermatologic Treatments and Research

Temporal spatial expression and function of non-muscle myosin II isoforms IIA and IIB in scar remodeling

Open access
Bond, Jennifer E, Ho, Trung Q, Selim, Maria Angelica, Hunter, Cedric L, Bowers, Edith V, Levinson, Howard·2011·Laboratory Investigation

Abstract

Scar contracture is believed to be caused by the cell contractility during the remodeling phase of wound healing. Cell contractility is mediated by non-muscle myosin II (NMMII) and actin, but the temporal-spatial expression profile of NMMII isoforms A and B (IIA and IIB) during the remodeling phase and the role of NMMII in scar fibroblast tissue remodeling are unknown. Human scar tissue immunostained for IIA and IIB showed that both isoforms were highly expressed in scar tissue throughout the remodeling phase of repair and expression levels returned to normal after the remodeling phase. Human scar tissue immunostained for β-, γ- and α-smooth muscle actin showed that all isoforms were consistently expressed throughout the remodeling phase of repair. The β- and γ-smooth muscle actin were widely expressed throughout the dermis, but α-smooth muscle actin was only locally expressed within the dermis. In vitro, fibroblasts explanted from scar tissue were shown to express more IIA than fibroblasts explanted from normal tissue and scar fibroblasts contracted collagen lattices to a greater extent than normal fibroblasts. Blebbistatin was used to demonstrate the function of NMMII in collagen lattice contraction. In normal tissue, fibroblasts are stress-shielded from external tensile stress by the extracellular matrix. After dermal injury and during remodeling, fibroblasts are exposed to a matrix of increased stiffness. The effect of matrix stiffness on IIA and IIB expression was examined. IIA expression was greater in fibroblasts cultured in collagen lattices with increasing stiffness, and in fibroblasts cultured on glass slides compared with polyacrylamide gels with stiffness of 1 kPa. In conclusion, NMMII and actin isoform expression changes coordinately with the remodeling phase of repair, and NMMII is increased as matrix stiffness increases. As NMMII expression increases, so does the fibroblast contractility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/labinvest.2010.181

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Myofibroblasts are contractile; their stress fibers consist of alpha smooth muscle actin (αSMA) and non-muscle myosin type II and contract in actin-myosin fashion.

    “Their microfilaments (also known as stress fibers) consist of alpha smooth muscle actin (αSMA) and non-muscle myosin type II (10) and can contract in typical actin-myosin fashion, albeit rather slowly compared to muscle actin myosin filaments.”

    From Unraveling SSc Pathophysiology; The Myofibroblast (2018) · cites this paper as [10]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bond, J. E., Ho, T. Q., Selim, M. A., Hunter, C. L., Bowers, E. V., & Levinson, H.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Levinson, Howard
Venue
Laboratory Investigation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
91
Issue
4
Pages
499-508
ISSN
0023-6837 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071410302
Cited by
46
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Laboratory Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (K08GM085562, GM085562-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Keywords
non-muscle myosin II, scar contracture, fibroblast contractility, collagen lattice contraction, extracellular matrix stiffness, smooth muscle actin, blebbistatin, scar fibroblasts
MeSH terms
Actins, Cicatrix, Elasticity, Extracellular Matrix, Female, Fibroblasts, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Time Factors, Tissue Distribution, Wound Healing, Up-Regulation, Protein Isoforms, Dermis, Nonmuscle Myosin Type IIB, Nonmuscle Myosin Type IIA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review