The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Omic data from evolved E. coli are consistent with computed optimal growth from genome‐scale models
Open accessAbstract
After hundreds of generations of adaptive evolution at exponential growth, Escherichia coli grows as predicted using flux balance analysis (FBA) on genome‐scale metabolic models (GEMs). However, it is not known whether the predicted pathway usage in FBA solutions is consistent with gene and protein expression in the wild‐type and evolved strains. Here, we report that >98% of active reactions from FBA optimal growth solutions are supported by transcriptomic and proteomic data. Moreover, when E. coli adapts to growth rate selective pressure, the evolved strains upregulate genes within the optimal growth predictions, and downregulate genes outside of the optimal growth solutions. In addition, bottlenecks from dosage limitations of computationally predicted essential genes are overcome in the evolved strains. We also identify regulatory processes that may contribute to the development of the optimal growth phenotype in the evolved strains, such as the downregulation of known regulons and stringent response suppression. Thus, differential gene and protein expression from wild‐type and adaptively evolved strains supports observed growth phenotype changes, and is consistent with GEM‐computed optimal growth states.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Escherichia coli K-12 undergoes adaptive evolution to achieve in silico predicted optimal growth
Ibarra, R. U., Edwards, J. S., & Palsson, B. O. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01149 · Cited by 857 · cited 6×
“In addition, the measured growth rates of evolved strains were shown to be consistent with most growth rate predictions from an in silico genome-scale metabolic model (GEM) of Escherichia coli (Ibarra et al , 2002; Fong and Palsson, 2004).”
InfluentialSelf-citationOptimality and evolutionary tuning of the expression level of a protein
Dekel, E., & Alon, U. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03842 · Cited by 766
Growth Rate-Dependent Global Effects on Gene Expression in Bacteria
Klumpp, S., Zhang, Z., & Hwa, T. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.001 · Cited by 703
Shifts in growth strategies reflect tradeoffs in cellular economics
Molenaar, D., van Berlo, R., de Ridder, D., & Teusink, B. (2009) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb.2009.82 · Cited by 653
The growing scope of applications of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions using Escherichia coli
Feist, A. M., & Palsson, B. Ø. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1401 · Cited by 545 · cited 1×
“To begin to address these questions, we use constraint-based modeling of E. coli K-12 metabolism (Feist and Palsson, 2008; Lewis et al , 2009b) to analyze a compendium of ‘omics’ data obtained from adaptive evolution experiments.”
Self-citationBeg, Q. K., Vazquez, A., Ernst, J., de Menezes, M. A., Bar-Joseph, Z., Barabási, A.-L., & Oltvai, Z. N. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0609845104 · Cited by 368
Fong, S. S., Joyce, A. R., & Palsson, B. Ø. (2005) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.3832305 · Cited by 265 · cited 11×
“Growth rates and substrate uptake rates were determined and reported earlier (Fong et al , 2005, 2006).”
InfluentialSelf-citationThiele, I., Jamshidi, N., Fleming, R. M. T., & Palsson, B. Ø. (2009) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000312 · Cited by 182 · cited 1×
“Thus, it is anticipated that genome-scale models of transcription and translation (Thiele et al , 2009) will be useful in evaluating the functional consequences of changes in these systems.”
Self-citationMetabolic Characterization of Escherichia coli Strains Adapted to Growth on Lactate
Hua, Q., Joyce, A. R., Palsson, B. Ø., & Fong, S. S. (2007) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00527-07 · Cited by 67
Self-citation
Cited by
Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox v2.0
Schellenberger, J., Que, R., Fleming, R. M. T., Thiele, I., Orth, J. D., Feist, A. M., Zielinski, D. C., Bordbar, A., Lewis, N. E., Rahmanian, S., et al. (2011) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2011.308 · Cited by 1,835
Self-citationConstraining the metabolic genotype–phenotype relationship using a phylogeny of in silico methods
Lewis, N. E., Nagarajan, H., & Palsson, B. O. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2737 · Cited by 779
Self-citationMetabolic modeling of single Th17 cells reveals regulators of autoimmunity
Wagner, A., Wang, C., Fessler, J., DeTomaso, D., Avila-Pacheco, J., Kaminski, J., Zaghouani, S., Christian, E., Thakore, P., Schellhaass, B., et al. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.05.045 · Cited by 524
Paxdb, a database of protein abundance averages across all three domains of life
Wang, M., Weiss, M., Simonovic, M., Haertinger, G., Schrimpf, S. P., Hengartner, M. O., & von Mering, C. (2012) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.o111.014704 · Cited by 466
Sánchez, B. J., Zhang, C., Nilsson, A., Lahtvee, P., Kerkhoven, E. J., & Nielsen, J. (2017) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20167411 · Cited by 466
Multidimensional Optimality of Microbial Metabolism
Schuetz, R., Zamboni, N., Zampieri, M., Heinemann, M., & Sauer, U. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1216882 · Cited by 420
Robinson, J. L., Kocabaş, P., Wang, H., Cholley, P.-E., Cook, D., Nilsson, A., Anton, M., Ferreira, R., Domenzain, I., Billa, V., et al. (2020) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.aaz1482 · Cited by 442
Self-citationBacterial growth laws and their applications
Scott, M., & Hwa, T. (2011) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2011.04.014 · Cited by 309
Network Context and Selection in the Evolution to Enzyme Specificity
Nam, H., Lewis, N. E., Lerman, J. A., Lee, D.-H., Chang, R. L., Kim, D., & Palsson, B. O. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1216861 · Cited by 277
Self-citationDavidi, D., Noor, E., Liebermeister, W., Bar-Even, A., Flamholz, A., Tummler, K., Barenholz, U., Goldenfeld, M., Shlomi, T., & Milo, R. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1514240113 · Cited by 266
In silico method for modelling metabolism and gene product expression at genome scale
Lerman, J. A., Hyduke, D. R., Latif, H., Portnoy, V. A., Lewis, N. E., Orth, J. D., Schrimpe-Rutledge, A. C., Smith, R. D., Adkins, J. N., Zengler, K., et al. (2012) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1928 · Cited by 266
Self-citationHeckmann, D., Lloyd, C. J., Mih, N., Ha, Y., Zielinski, D. C., Haiman, Z. B., Desouki, A. A., Lercher, M. J., & Palsson, B. O. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07652-6 · Cited by 218
Self-citationEssential metabolism for a minimal cell
Breuer, M., Earnest, E. E., Merryman, C., Wise, K. S., Sun, L., Lynott, M. R., Hutchison, C. A., Smith, H. O., Lapek, J. D., Gonzalez, D. J., et al. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.36842 · Cited by 190
Turnover number predictions for kinetically uncharacterized enzymes using machine and deep learning
Kroll, A., Rousset, Y., Hu, X.-P., Liebrand, N. A., & Lercher, M. J. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39840-4 · Cited by 186
Reconciled rat and human metabolic networks for comparative toxicogenomics and biomarker predictions
Blais, E. M., Rawls, K. D., Dougherty, B. V., Li, Z. I., Kolling, G. L., Ye, P., Wallqvist, A., & Papin, J. A. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14250 · Cited by 182
Adadi, R., Volkmer, B., Milo, R., Heinemann, M., & Shlomi, T. (2012) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002575 · Cited by 179
Proteome reallocation in Escherichia coli with increasing specific growth rate
Peebo, K., Valgepea, K., Maser, A., Nahku, R., Adamberg, K., & Vilu, R. (2015) · Molecular BioSystems · doi:10.1039/c4mb00721b · Cited by 145
Metabolic Trade-offs in Yeast are Caused by F1F0-ATP synthase
Nilsson, A., & Nielsen, J. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep22264 · Cited by 137
Oftadeh, O., Salvy, P., Masid, M., Curvat, M., Miskovic, L., & Hatzimanikatis, V. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25158-6 · Cited by 99
A Caenorhabditis elegans genome-scale metabolic network model
Yilmaz, L. S., & Walhout, A. J. M. (2016) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2016.04.012 · Cited by 88
Zhang, J., Li, X., Olmedo, M., Holdorf, A. D., Shang, Y., Artal-Sanz, M., Yilmaz, L. S., & Walhout, A. J. M. (2019) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2019.07.010 · Cited by 77
Machado, D., Herrgård, M. J., & Rocha, I. (2016) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005140 · Cited by 82
Enzyme capacity-based genome scale modelling of CHO cells
Yeo, H. C., Hong, J., Lakshmanan, M., & Lee, D.-Y. (2020) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2020.04.005 · Cited by 75
Lessons on enzyme kinetics from quantitative proteomics
Davidi, D., & Milo, R. (2017) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2017.02.007 · Cited by 72
Teo, E., Ravi, S., Barardo, D., Kim, H.-S., Fong, S., Cazenave-Gassiot, A., Tan, T. Y., Ching, J., Kovalik, J.-P., Wenk, M. R., et al. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.50069 · Cited by 72
Kok, S., Nijkamp, J. F., Oud, B., Roque, F. C., Ridder, D., Daran, J.-M., Pronk, J. T., & Maris, A. J. A. (2012) · FEMS Yeast Research · doi:10.1111/j.1567-1364.2011.00787.x · Cited by 65
Plant genome-scale reconstruction: from single cell to multi-tissue modelling and omics analyses
Gomes de Oliveira Dal’Molin, C., & Nielsen, L. K. (2018) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2017.07.009 · Cited by 35
The role of cellular objectives and selective pressures in metabolic pathway evolution
Nam, H., Conrad, T. M., & Lewis, N. E. (2011) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2011.03.006 · Cited by 32
“coli are accompanied by improved use of the model-predicted optimal metabolic pathways[17].”
InfluentialSelf-citationConstruction and Analysis of an Enzyme-Constrained Metabolic Model of Corynebacterium glutamicum
Niu, J., Mao, Z., Mao, Y., Wu, K., Shi, Z., Yuan, Q., Cai, J., & Ma, H. (2022) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom12101499 · Cited by 32
ecBSU1: A Genome-Scale Enzyme-Constrained Model of Bacillus subtilis Based on the ECMpy Workflow
Wu, K., Mao, Z., Mao, Y., Niu, J., Cai, J., Yuan, Q., Yun, L., Liao, X., Wang, Z., & Ma, H. (2023) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms11010178 · Cited by 25
Population FBA predicts metabolic phenotypes in yeast
Labhsetwar, P., Melo, M. C. R., Cole, J. A., & Luthey-Schulten, Z. (2017) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005728 · Cited by 21
Mathematical models of plant metabolism
Shi, H., & Schwender, J. (2016) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2015.10.008 · Cited by 21
Resource allocation in mammalian systems
Baghdassarian, H. M., & Lewis, N. E. (2024) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2023.108305 · Cited by 17
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewis, N. E., Hixson, K. K., Conrad, T. M., Lerman, J. A., Charusanti, P., Polpitiya, A. D., Adkins, J. N., Schramm, G., Purvine, S. O., Lopez‐Ferrer, D., Weitz, K. K., Eils, R., König, R., Smith, R. D., & Palsson, B. Ø.
- Venue
- Molecular Systems Biology
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 390-390
- ISSN
- 1744-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160541874
- Cited by
- 753
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 8.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
