Cited by 854Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

Patterns of predation in a diverse predator–prey system

Sinclair, A. R. E., Mduma, Simon, Brashares, Justin S.·2003·Nature

Abstract

There are many cases where animal populations are affected by predators and resources in terrestrial ecosystems, but the factors that determine when one or the other predominates remain poorly understood. Here we show, using 40 years of data from the highly diverse mammal community of the Serengeti ecosystem, East Africa, that the primary cause of mortality for adults of a particular species is determined by two factors--the species diversity of both the predators and prey and the body size of that prey species relative to other prey and predators. Small ungulates in Serengeti are exposed to more predators, owing to opportunistic predation, than are larger ungulates; they also suffer greater predation rates, and experience strong predation pressure. A threshold occurs at prey body sizes of approximately 150 kg, above which ungulate species have few natural predators and exhibit food limitation. Thus, biodiversity allows both predation (top-down) and resource limitation (bottom-up) to act simultaneously to affect herbivore populations. This result may apply generally in systems where there is a diversity of predators and prey.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature01934

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Carnivore prey preferences are largely determined by the size of their prey.

    “Antelopes were grouped based on size, as carnivore prey preferences are largely determined by the size of their prey (Kruuk and Turner 1967;A. R. Sinclair et al. 2003).”

    From A Food Web Model of the Serengeti: Stability, Dynamics and Indirect Effects (2026) · cites this paper as A. R. Sinclair et al. 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sinclair, A. R. E., Mduma, S., & Brashares, J. S.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute (TZ)
Corresponding author
Sinclair, A. R. E.
Venue
Nature
Published
2003-09
Volume
425
Issue
6955
Pages
288-290
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1978170239
Cited by
854
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 35
FWCI
11.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
predation, predator-prey interactions, predator diversity, prey diversity, body size, ungulates, top-down control, bottom-up control, food limitation, resource constraints, biodiversity, Serengeti, mammal communities
MeSH terms
Africa, Eastern, Animals, Body Weight, Food, Mammals, Population Dynamics, Predatory Behavior, Ecosystem, Food Chain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review