Cited by 82Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesRangeland and Wildlife Management

Spatial distribution of lion kills determined by the water dependency of prey species

Open access
de Boer, Willem F., Vis, Marc J. P., de Knegt, Henrik J., Rowles, Colin, Kohi, Edward M., van Langevelde, Frank, Peel, Mike, Pretorius, Yolanda +4 more·2010·Journal of Mammalogy

Abstract

Predation risk from lions (Panthera leo) has been linked to habitat characteristics and availability and traits of prey. We separated the effects of vegetation density and the presence of drinking water by analyzing locations of lion kills in relation to rivers with dense vegetation, which offer good lion stalking opportunities, and artificial water points with low vegetation density. The spatial distribution of lion kills was studied at the Klaserie Private Nature Reserve, South Africa. The distance between 215 lion kills and the nearest water source was analyzed using generalized linear models. Lions selected medium-sized prey species. Lion kills were closer to rivers and to artificial water points than expected by random distribution of the kills. Water that attracted prey, and not the vegetation density in riverine areas, increased predation risk, with kills of buffalo (Syncerus caffer), kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros), and wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus) as water-dependent prey species. Traits of prey species, including feeding type (food habits), digestion type (ruminant or nonruminant); or body size, did not explain locations of lion kills, and no seasonal patterns in lion kills were apparent. We argue that the cascading impact of lions on local mammal assemblages is spatially heterogeneous.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1644/09-mamm-a-392.1

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Buffalo are a preferred prey species in several savanna ecosystems.

    “Whereas buffalo are a preferred prey species in several savanna ecosystems [21,57,58], they constituted less than 5% of kills found during our study, and less than 1% of male kills (Table 5), despite male lions specifically targeting buffalo elsewhere [52].”
  • Our recorded prey spectrum differs from other studies that employed similar methods.

    “Nevertheless, our recorded prey spectrum differs from other studies that employed similar methods [21,22], and large carcasses (such as the species in focus here) are less likely influenced by these limitations [59].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Boer, W. F., Vis, M. J. P., de Knegt, H. J., Rowles, C., Kohi, E. M., van Langevelde, F., Peel, M., Pretorius, Y., Skidmore, A. K., Slotow, R., van Wieren, S. E., & Prins, H. H. T.
Affiliations
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Venue
Journal of Mammalogy
Published
2010-10-15
Volume
91
Issue
5
Pages
1280-1286
ISSN
  • 0022-2372 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-1542
OpenAlex
W2135576707
Cited by
82
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Mammalogy (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
American Society of Mammalogists
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
lion predation, lion, water dependency, rivers, vegetation density, prey selection, predation risk, buffalo, Kudus, wildebeest, ruminants, cascading effects, spatial distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review