The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A genome-wide comparison of recent chimpanzee and human segmental duplications
Abstract
We present a global comparison of differences in content of segmental duplication between human and chimpanzee, and determine that 33% of human duplications (> 94% sequence identity) are not duplicated in chimpanzee, including some human disease-causing duplications. Combining experimental and computational approaches, we estimate a genomic duplication rate of 4-5 megabases per million years since divergence. These changes have resulted in gene expression differences between the species. In terms of numbers of base pairs affected, we determine that de novo duplication has contributed most significantly to differences between the species, followed by deletion of ancestral duplications. Post-speciation gene conversion accounts for less than 10% of recent segmental duplication. Chimpanzee-specific hyperexpansion (> 100 copies) of particular segments of DNA have resulted in marked quantitative differences and alterations in the genome landscape between chimpanzee and human. Almost all of the most extreme differences relate to changes in chromosome structure, including the emergence of African great ape subterminal heterochromatin. Nevertheless, base per base, large segmental duplication events have had a greater impact (2.7%) in altering the genomic landscape of these two species than single-base-pair substitution (1.2%).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“since the chimpanzee chromosomes 2A and 2B are capped with hyper-expanded segmental duplications and tandem repeats (StSats) not existing in the human genome [8, 40], we cannot measure the magnitude of the accumulation of BCS in those fragments comparing to the human reference.”
From Revised time estimation of the ancestral human chromosome 2 fusion (2022) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cites
Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03001 · Cited by 4,971
Detection of large-scale variation in the human genome
Iafrate, A. J., Feuk, L., Rivera, M. N., Listewnik, M. L., Donahoe, P. K., Qi, Y., Scherer, S. W., & Lee, C. (2004) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1416 · Cited by 2,892
Large-scale copy number polymorphism in the human genome
Sebat, J., Lakshmi, B., Troge, J., Alexander, J., Young, J., Lundin, P., Månér, S., Massa, H., Walker, M., Chi, M., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1098918 · Cited by 2,557
Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome
The Chimpanzee Sequencing and Analysis Consortium (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04072 · Cited by 2,459
Recent Segmental Duplications in the Human Genome
Bailey, J. A., Gu, Z., Clark, R. A., Reinert, K., Samonte, R. V., Schwartz, S., Adams, M. D., Myers, E. W., Li, P. W., & Eichler, E. E. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1072047 · Cited by 1,355
Self-citationThe Influence of CCL3L1 Gene-Containing Segmental Duplications on HIV-1/AIDS Susceptibility
Gonzalez, E., Kulkarni, H. R., Bolivar, H., Mangano, A. M., Sanchez, R., Catano, G., Nibbs, R. J. B., Freedman, B. I., Quinones, M. P., Bamshad, M. J., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1101160 · Cited by 1,145
Fine-scale structural variation of the human genome
Tüzün, E., Sharp, A. J., Bailey, J. A., Kaul, R., Morrison, V., Pertz, L. M., Haugen, E., Hayden, H. S., Albertson, D. G., Pinkel, D., et al. (2005) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1562 · Cited by 1,000
Self-citationSegmental Duplications and Copy-Number Variation in the Human Genome
Sharp, A. J., Locke, D. P., McGrath, S. D., Cheng, Z., Bailey, J. A., Vallente, R. U., Pertz, L. M., Clark, R. A., Schwartz, S., Segraves, R., et al. (2005) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/431652 · Cited by 983
Self-citationGenome architecture, rearrangements and genomic disorders
Stankiewicz, P., & Lupski, J. R. (2002) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/s0168-9525(02)02592-1 · Cited by 938
A common inversion under selection in Europeans
Stefánsson, H., Helgason, A., Þorleifsson, G., Steinthórsdóttir, V., Másson, G., Barnard, J., Baker, A., Jónasdóttir, Á., Ingason, A., Gudnadottir, V. G., et al. (2005) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1508 · Cited by 847
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The ENCODE Project Consortium (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05874 · Cited by 5,223
Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome
The Chimpanzee Sequencing and Analysis Consortium (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04072 · Cited by 2,459
Structural variation in the human genome
Feuk, L., Carson, A. R., & Scherer, S. W. (2006) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1767 · Cited by 2,111
Diet and the evolution of human amylase gene copy number variation
Perry, G. H., Dominy, N. J., Claw, K. G., Lee, A. S., Fiegler, H., Redon, R., Werner, J., Villanea, F. A., Mountain, J. L., Misra, R., et al. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng2123 · Cited by 1,496
Evolutionary and biomedical insights from the rhesus macaque genome.
Gibbs, R. A., Rogers, J., Katze, M. G., Bumgarner, R., Weinstock, G. M., Mardis, E. R., Remington, K. A., Strausberg, R. L., Venter, J. C., Wilson, R. K., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1139247 · Cited by 1,403
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, Z., Ventura, M., She, X., Khaitovich, P., Graves, T., Osoegawa, K., Church, D., DeJong, P., Wilson, R. K., Pääbo, S., Rocchi, M., & Eichler, E. E.
- Affiliations
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
- Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eichler, Evan E.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 437
- Issue
- 7055
- Pages
- 88-93
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1971369643
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 27.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
- Keywords
- segmental duplication, human-chimpanzee comparison, de novo duplication, gene conversion, subtelomeric heterochromatin, gene expression differences, primate genome evolution, human evolution, chimpanzee genome, Y-linked genes, chromosome structure, comparative genomics
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Pan troglodytes, Gene Conversion, Humans, Species Specificity, Time Factors, Genome, Human, Evolution, Molecular, Computational Biology, Gene Duplication, Genomics, Chromosomes, Mammalian
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
