Cited by 235Axon Guidance and Neuronal SignalingDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research

Dscam diversity is essential for neuronal wiring and self-recognition

Open access
Hattori, Daisuke, Demir, Ebru, Kim, Ho Won, Viragh, Erika, Zipursky, S. Lawrence, Dickson, Barry J.·2007·Nature

Abstract

Neurons are thought to use diverse families of cell-surface molecules for cell recognition during circuit assembly. In Drosophila, alternative splicing of the Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule (Dscam) gene potentially generates 38,016 closely related transmembrane proteins of the immunoglobulin superfamily, each comprising one of 19,008 alternative ectodomains linked to one of two alternative transmembrane segments. These ectodomains show isoform-specific homophilic binding, leading to speculation that Dscam proteins mediate cell recognition. Genetic studies have established that Dscam is required for neural circuit assembly, but the extent to which isoform diversity contributes to this process is not known. Here we provide conclusive evidence that Dscam diversity is essential for circuit assembly. Using homologous recombination, we reduced the entire repertoire of Dscam ectodomains to just a single isoform. Neural circuits in these mutants are severely disorganized. Furthermore, we show that it is crucial for neighbouring neurons to express distinct isoforms, but that the specific identity of the isoforms expressed in an individual neuron is unimportant. We conclude that Dscam diversity provides each neuron with a unique identity by which it can distinguish its own processes from those of other neurons, and that this self-recognition is essential for wiring the Drosophila brain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature06099

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even within the same system, such as the fly olfactory pathway, some neuronal wiring is highly specific and molecularly programmed, while other wiring is effectively random, and yet other wiring is learned.

    “It is known that, even within the same system, such as the fly olfactory pathway, some neuronal wiring is highly specific and molecularly programmed (Hattori et al., 2007; Hong and Luo, 2014), while other wiring is effectively random (Caron et al., 2013), and yet other wiring is learned (Aso et al., 2014a).”

    From Toward an integration of deep learning and neuroscience (2016) · cites this paper as Hattori et al., 2007

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hattori, D., Demir, E., Kim, H. W., Viragh, E., Zipursky, S. L., & Dickson, B. J.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (AT)
Corresponding author
  • Zipursky, S. Lawrence
  • Dickson, Barry J.
Venue
Nature
Published
2007-09-13
Volume
449
Issue
7159
Pages
223-227
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2000103717
Cited by
225
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Keywords
Dscam, Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule, alternative splicing, immunoglobulin superfamily, homophilic binding, mosaic analysis, Drosophila central nervous system, isoform diversity
MeSH terms
Alleles, Animals, Brain, Drosophila melanogaster, Mutation, Neurons, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Alternative Splicing, Protein Isoforms, Mushroom Bodies, Drosophila Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review